* [Bug target/19645] [4.0 Regression] PPC64 64-bit build failure
2005-01-26 19:36 [Bug target/19645] New: PPC64 64-bit build failure dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-26 20:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-26 21:05 ` [Bug target/19645] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-26 20:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |critical
Summary|PPC64 64-bit build failure |[4.0 Regression] PPC64 64-
| |bit build failure
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19645
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/19645] PPC64 64-bit build failure
2005-01-26 19:36 [Bug target/19645] New: PPC64 64-bit build failure dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-26 20:52 ` [Bug target/19645] [4.0 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-26 21:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-27 17:43 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-26 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|critical |normal
Keywords| |build, ice-on-valid-code
Summary|[4.0 Regression] PPC64 64- |PPC64 64-bit build failure
|bit build failure |
Target Milestone|4.0.0 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19645
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/19645] PPC64 64-bit build failure
2005-01-26 19:36 [Bug target/19645] New: PPC64 64-bit build failure dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-26 20:52 ` [Bug target/19645] [4.0 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-26 21:05 ` [Bug target/19645] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-27 17:43 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-27 17:46 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: dje at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-27 17:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19645
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/19645] PPC64 64-bit build failure
2005-01-26 19:36 [Bug target/19645] New: PPC64 64-bit build failure dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-27 17:43 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-27 17:46 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-27 18:41 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: dje at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-27 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-27 17:43 -------
I bootstrapped in 64-bit mode and did not encounter any checking failure. Was
extra checking enabled? I used SLES9 gcc-3_3-hammer as the bootstrap compiler.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19645
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/19645] PPC64 64-bit build failure
2005-01-26 19:36 [Bug target/19645] New: PPC64 64-bit build failure dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-27 17:46 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-27 18:41 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-27 19:10 ` dje at watson dot ibm dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-27 18:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-27 18:41 -------
No, no extra anything. This is on a newly installed fedora core 4 system,
so glibc 2.3.4 and gcc 3.4.3-20050113 as bootstrap compiler.
I guess I'll try again and post a .i file if reproducible, or fix it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19645
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/19645] PPC64 64-bit build failure
2005-01-26 19:36 [Bug target/19645] New: PPC64 64-bit build failure dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-27 18:41 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-27 19:10 ` dje at watson dot ibm dot com
2005-01-27 20:38 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: dje at watson dot ibm dot com @ 2005-01-27 19:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From dje at watson dot ibm dot com 2005-01-27 19:09 -------
Subject: Re: PPC64 64-bit build failure
I configured with:
--build=powerpc64-linux --host=powerpc64-linux --target=powerpc64-linux
--with-cpu=default32 --enable-threads=posix --enable-shared
--enable-__cxa_atexit
--with-gcc-version-trigger=/home/dje/src/src/gcc/version.c
--enable-languages=c,c++
I am building everything with -m64.
Are you also adding -mcpu=G5?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19645
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/19645] PPC64 64-bit build failure
2005-01-26 19:36 [Bug target/19645] New: PPC64 64-bit build failure dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-27 19:10 ` dje at watson dot ibm dot com
@ 2005-01-27 20:38 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-27 21:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-27 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-27 20:34 -------
Subject: Re: PPC64 64-bit build failure
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 07:09:58PM -0000, dje at watson dot ibm dot com wrote:
> --build=powerpc64-linux --host=powerpc64-linux --target=powerpc64-linux
> --with-cpu=default32 --enable-threads=posix --enable-shared
> --enable-__cxa_atexit
> --with-gcc-version-trigger=/home/dje/src/src/gcc/version.c
> --enable-languages=c,c++
I'm using no special options. In particular, no --with-cpu=default32.
r~
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19645
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/19645] PPC64 64-bit build failure
2005-01-26 19:36 [Bug target/19645] New: PPC64 64-bit build failure dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-27 20:38 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-27 21:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-27 21:20 ` dje at watson dot ibm dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-27 21:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-27 21:15 -------
--with-cpu=default32 builds 32bit by default IIRC.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19645
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/19645] PPC64 64-bit build failure
2005-01-26 19:36 [Bug target/19645] New: PPC64 64-bit build failure dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-27 21:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-27 21:20 ` dje at watson dot ibm dot com
2005-01-28 0:18 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: dje at watson dot ibm dot com @ 2005-01-27 21:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From dje at watson dot ibm dot com 2005-01-27 21:20 -------
Subject: Re: PPC64 64-bit build failure
--with-cpu=default32 builds 32bit by default IIRC.
You obviously replied without reading my message. I said, "I am building
everything with -m64".
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19645
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/19645] PPC64 64-bit build failure
2005-01-26 19:36 [Bug target/19645] New: PPC64 64-bit build failure dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-27 21:20 ` dje at watson dot ibm dot com
@ 2005-01-28 0:18 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-28 0:19 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-28 8:12 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: dje at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-28 0:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-28 00:18 -------
I bootstrapped again omitting --with-cpu=default32 and with -m64. No problems.
I also built and installed gcc version 3.4.4 20050109 (prerelease) and used it
to bootstrap with -m64. No problems.
--enable-threads=posix is the default for Linux, so that should not have any effect.
When I originally tried bootstrapping on PPC Linux, I had problems before I used
the incantation. I do not remember if the failure was due to checking. You
might try adding the following options to configure
--build=powerpc64-linux --host=powerpc64-linux --target=powerpc64-linux
--enable-shared --enable-__cxa_atexit
and see if that effects your results.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19645
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/19645] PPC64 64-bit build failure
2005-01-26 19:36 [Bug target/19645] New: PPC64 64-bit build failure dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-28 0:18 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-28 0:19 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-28 8:12 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: dje at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-28 0:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-28 00:18 -------
I bootstrapped again omitting --with-cpu=default32 and with -m64. No problems.
I also built and installed gcc version 3.4.4 20050109 (prerelease) and used it
to bootstrap with -m64. No problems.
--enable-threads=posix is the default for Linux, so that should not have any effect.
When I originally tried bootstrapping on PPC Linux, I had problems before I used
the incantation. I do not remember if the failure was due to checking. You
might try adding the following options to configure
--build=powerpc64-linux --host=powerpc64-linux --target=powerpc64-linux
--enable-shared --enable-__cxa_atexit
and see if that affects your results.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19645
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/19645] PPC64 64-bit build failure
2005-01-26 19:36 [Bug target/19645] New: PPC64 64-bit build failure dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-28 0:19 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-28 8:12 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-28 8:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-28 08:11 -------
I'm starting to think there's something wrong with the system 64-bit libc.
Lets close for now, and I'll report again if I can find something reproducible.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19645
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread