From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23811 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2005 08:30:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23767 invoked by uid 48); 29 Jan 2005 08:30:36 -0000 Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 08:30:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050129083036.23766.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20031204101218.13300.rsandifo@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20031204101218.13300.rsandifo@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/13300] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] Variable incorrectly identified as a biv X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg04296.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-29 08:30 ------- The purpose of this PR is to trak a bogus assumption in loop.c, and that assumption is still there. See the referenced gcc-patches message. So although the testcase might be fixed, I think we should still keep this open. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13300