From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13230 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2005 15:33:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10834 invoked by uid 48); 29 Jan 2005 15:32:30 -0000 Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 15:33:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050129153230.10833.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050128064457.19664.andreas.pokorny@gmx.de> References: <20050128064457.19664.andreas.pokorny@gmx.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/19664] libstdc++ headers should have pop/push of the visibility around the declarations X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg04337.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-29 15:32 ------- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > I am also refereing to this example: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2005-01/msg00300.html > > Now there is a libstdc++ bug for not using pop/push of the visibility in the headers which is not what > I orginally thought this bug was about. If you actually commented saying that this came from libstdc++ and then I would have commented saying that there needs some push/pop in the headers but instead you gave a simplified example which is not a gcc/linker bug but a programmers mistake. Confirmed, changing the summary to match the correct the sumbitter's mistake of not giving the full story. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Component|target |libstdc++ Ever Confirmed| |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-01-29 15:32:29 date| | Summary|-fvisibility-inlines-hidden |libstdc++ headers should |fails with gcc's extern |have pop/push of the |template extension on amd64 |visibility around the | |declarations http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19664