From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27813 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2005 21:19:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27789 invoked by uid 48); 29 Jan 2005 21:19:09 -0000 Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 21:19:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050129211909.27788.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050126134950.19639.rguenth@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de> References: <20050126134950.19639.rguenth@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/19639] Funny (horrible) code for empty destructor X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg04384.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-29 21:19 ------- As(In reply to comment #7) > Or we could simply unroll the loop completely, but while SCEV finds > the IV as Again this is most likely because fold does not fold "&x.foo[2] - 4B" to "&x.foo[0]", or someone forgets to call fold on that. I know that fold_stmt can do it. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19639