From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26194 invoked by alias); 1 Feb 2005 17:30:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26091 invoked by uid 48); 1 Feb 2005 17:30:25 -0000 Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 17:30:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050201173025.26090.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050201140539.19741.eda-qa@disemia.com> References: <20050201140539.19741.eda-qa@disemia.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/19741] suboptimal error message for template functions (as opposed to non-templates) X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg00094.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-02-01 17:30 ------- Except that, of course, in the present case the overload set contains only a single function (foo2 isn't overloaded, and we have specified all template arguments). Which should make it even easier to handle this particular case. W. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19741