public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/19217] New: ICE: verify_stmts failed: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set
@ 2005-01-01  6:55 aj at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-01  6:56 ` [Bug tree-optimization/19217] " aj at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (14 more replies)
  0 siblings, 15 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: aj at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-01  6:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

I received the following ICE with current GCC CVS: 
 
$ /usr/lib/gcc/i586-suse-linux/4.0.0/cc1 -fpreprocessed splinesave.i -quiet 
-dumpbase splinesave.c -march=i686 -mtune=i686 -auxbase-strip splinesave.o -O2 
-Wall-Wmissing-prototypes -Wunused -Wimplicit -Wreturn-type -Wparentheses 
-Wformat -Wchar-subscripts -version -fmessage-length=0 -fno-strict-aliasing -o 
splinesave.s 
GNU C version 4.0.0 20041231 (experimental) (SUSE Linux) (i586-suse-linux) 
        compiled by GNU C version 4.0.0 20041231 (experimental) (SUSE Linux). 
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=30 --param ggc-min-heapsize=4096 
splinesave.c: In function ?NumberHints?: 
splinesave.c:92: warning: ?i? may be used uninitialized in this function 
splinesave.c: In function ?_CvtPsSplineSet?: 
splinesave.c:862: error: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set 
temp3D.13981 
 
splinesave.c:862: internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed. 
Please submit a full bug report, 
with preprocessed source if appropriate. 
 
I reduced the testcase a little bit and get on Linux/x86-64 with -m32 the 
following additional information: 
(gdb) r -m32 -fpreprocessed splinesave.i -quiet -dumpbase splinesave.c 
-march=i686 -mtune=i686 -auxbase-strip splinesave.o -O2 -Wall 
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wunused -Wimplicit -Wreturn-type -Wparentheses -Wformat 
-Wchar-subscripts -version -fmessage-length=0 -fno-strict-aliasing -o 
splinesave.s 
GNU C version 4.0.0 20041231 (experimental) (x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) 
        compiled by GNU C version 4.0.0 20041231 (experimental). 
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=30 --param ggc-min-heapsize=4096 
splinesave.i: In function ?_CvtPsSplineSet?: 
splinesave.i:6402: error: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set 
temp3D.12084 
 
 
Breakpoint 2, internal_error (msgid=0x850fdd "verify_stmts failed.") 
    at /cvs/gcc/gcc/diagnostic.c:496 
496     { 
(gdb) bt 
#0  internal_error (msgid=0x850fdd "verify_stmts failed.") 
    at /cvs/gcc/gcc/diagnostic.c:496 
#1  0x000000000046b1ae in verify_stmts () at /cvs/gcc/gcc/tree-cfg.c:3547 
#2  0x00000000004f242b in tree_ssa_iv_optimize (loops=0xb7e1d0) 
    at /cvs/gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:5155 
#3  0x000000000047bc46 in execute_pass_list (pass=0xa72d80) 
    at /cvs/gcc/gcc/tree-optimize.c:525 
#4  0x000000000047bcdb in execute_pass_list (pass=0xa730e0) 
    at /cvs/gcc/gcc/tree-optimize.c:563 
#5  0x000000000047bcdb in execute_pass_list (pass=0xa6e0c0) 
    at /cvs/gcc/gcc/tree-optimize.c:563 
#6  0x000000000047bf39 in tree_rest_of_compilation (fndecl=0x2a95a76b60) 
    at /cvs/gcc/gcc/tree-optimize.c:661 
#7  0x0000000000419c73 in c_expand_body (fndecl=0x2a95a76b60) 
    at /cvs/gcc/gcc/c-decl.c:6383 
#8  0x000000000078af50 in cgraph_expand_function (node=0x2a95a7b000) 
    at /cvs/gcc/gcc/cgraphunit.c:822 
#9  0x000000000078c5b1 in cgraph_optimize () at /cvs/gcc/gcc/cgraphunit.c:1689 
#10 0x00000000007381b1 in toplev_main (argc=Variable "argc" is not available. 
) at /cvs/gcc/gcc/toplev.c:1005 
#11 0x0000002a9568900d in __libc_start_main () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 
#12 0x00000000004025ea in _start () at start.S:113

-- 
           Summary: ICE: verify_stmts failed: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE
                    bit not set
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.0.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: tree-optimization
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: aj at gcc dot gnu dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org,rakdver at gcc dot gnu
                    dot org
 GCC build triplet: i586-pc-linux-gnu
  GCC host triplet: i586-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i586-pc-linux-gnu


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19217


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/19217] ICE: verify_stmts failed: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set
  2005-01-01  6:55 [Bug tree-optimization/19217] New: ICE: verify_stmts failed: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set aj at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-01  6:56 ` aj at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-01  6:57 ` [Bug tree-optimization/19217] [4.0 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (13 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: aj at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-01  6:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From aj at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-01 06:56 -------
Created an attachment (id=7857)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7857&action=view)
Preprocessed source file


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19217


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/19217] [4.0 Regression] ICE: verify_stmts failed: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set
  2005-01-01  6:55 [Bug tree-optimization/19217] New: ICE: verify_stmts failed: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set aj at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-01  6:56 ` [Bug tree-optimization/19217] " aj at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-01  6:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-01  7:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (12 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-01  6:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org
           Keywords|                            |ice-on-valid-code
            Summary|ICE: verify_stmts failed:   |[4.0 Regression] ICE:
                   |address taken, but          |verify_stmts failed: address
                   |ADDRESSABLE bit not set     |taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit
                   |                            |not set
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.0.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19217


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/19217] [4.0 Regression] ICE: verify_stmts failed: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set
  2005-01-01  6:55 [Bug tree-optimization/19217] New: ICE: verify_stmts failed: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set aj at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-01  6:56 ` [Bug tree-optimization/19217] " aj at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-01  6:57 ` [Bug tree-optimization/19217] [4.0 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-01  7:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-01  7:38 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (11 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-01  7:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-01 07:28 -------
Confirmed, reduced testcase:
void flexto(int *current,int instance_count)
{
  int *end, temp, j;
  for ( j=0; j<instance_count; ++j )
    end = &temp;
  *current = *end;
}


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2005-01-01 07:28:16
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19217


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/19217] [4.0 Regression] ICE: verify_stmts failed: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set
  2005-01-01  6:55 [Bug tree-optimization/19217] New: ICE: verify_stmts failed: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set aj at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-01-01  7:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-01  7:38 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-01  7:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-01  7:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-01 07:38 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> Confirmed, reduced testcase:
> void flexto(int *current,int instance_count)
> {
>   int *end, temp, j;
>   for ( j=0; j<instance_count; ++j )
>     end = &temp;
>   *current = *end;
> }

Just a note, this is broken before the loop optimizations are run and it looks like it was caused by (my 
patch):
2004-11-30  Andrew Pinski  <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>

        PR tree-opt/18298
        * tree-optimize.c (init_tree_optimization_passes): Add a may_alias
        pass right after fold builtins.

But It just exposes a latent bug in may_alias as we don't keep temp marked as a non gimple register 
even though the variable has its address taken still  (yes adding a dce pass right before may_alias will 
work around the problem but that does not fix the other problem, we should be able to call may_alias 
even without calling dce).

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19217


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/19217] [4.0 Regression] ICE: verify_stmts failed: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set
  2005-01-01  6:55 [Bug tree-optimization/19217] New: ICE: verify_stmts failed: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set aj at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-01-01  7:38 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-01  7:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-01 15:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-01  7:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-01 07:53 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
One more note, this does not happen on the tcb but that is because we call dce after the first ccp and 
before the next may_alias.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19217


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/19217] [4.0 Regression] ICE: verify_stmts failed: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set
  2005-01-01  6:55 [Bug tree-optimization/19217] New: ICE: verify_stmts failed: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set aj at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-01-01  7:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-01 15:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-01 15:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-01 15:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-01 15:31 -------
I think the problem is that we don't see the the address taken at all because we don't walk over the PHI 
nodes in compute_points_to_and_addr_escape so when we have dead code in PHIs we miss them.
Note this comment is wrong with respect with dead code:
	  /* Mark all the variables whose address are taken by the
	     statement.  Note that this will miss all the addresses taken
	     in PHI nodes (those are discovered while following the use-def
	     chains).  */

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19217


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/19217] [4.0 Regression] ICE: verify_stmts failed: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set
  2005-01-01  6:55 [Bug tree-optimization/19217] New: ICE: verify_stmts failed: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set aj at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-01-01 15:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-01 15:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-04 15:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-01 15:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-01 15:44 -------
You can see the problem with this testcase (but we don't ICE because we only call verify_stmts in IV-
OPTS :( ):
void flexto(int *current,int instance_count)
{
  int *end, temp, j;
  if (0<instance_count)
    end = &temp;
  *current = *end;
} 

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19217


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/19217] [4.0 Regression] ICE: verify_stmts failed: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set
  2005-01-01  6:55 [Bug tree-optimization/19217] New: ICE: verify_stmts failed: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set aj at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-01-01 15:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-04 15:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-24  9:52 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-04 15:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-04 15:48 -------
: Search converges between 2004-11-30-014001-trunk (#665) and 2004-12-01-014001-trunk 
(#666).

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19217


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/19217] [4.0 Regression] ICE: verify_stmts failed: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set
  2005-01-01  6:55 [Bug tree-optimization/19217] New: ICE: verify_stmts failed: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set aj at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-01-04 15:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-24  9:52 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-24 13:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-24  9:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-24 09:51 -------
I cannot reproduce this with the original test case and yesterday's 
CVS HEAD. 
 

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19217


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/19217] [4.0 Regression] ICE: verify_stmts failed: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set
  2005-01-01  6:55 [Bug tree-optimization/19217] New: ICE: verify_stmts failed: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set aj at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-01-24  9:52 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-24 13:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-24 13:43 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-24 13:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-24 13:24 -------
(In reply to comment #8)
> I cannot reproduce this with the original test case and yesterday's 
> CVS HEAD. 
Did you use --disable-checking (please look at the keywords)?

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19217


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/19217] [4.0 Regression] ICE: verify_stmts failed: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set
  2005-01-01  6:55 [Bug tree-optimization/19217] New: ICE: verify_stmts failed: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set aj at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-01-24 13:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-24 13:43 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-02-01  9:38 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-24 13:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-24 13:43 -------
This should be a checking compiler, or at least I didn't disable checking 
explicitly.  I did use a non-gcc to build it, perhaps that turned off 
checking... 
 

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19217


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/19217] [4.0 Regression] ICE: verify_stmts failed: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set
  2005-01-01  6:55 [Bug tree-optimization/19217] New: ICE: verify_stmts failed: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set aj at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-01-24 13:43 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-01  9:38 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-02-01 11:35 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-01  9:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-02-01 09:37 -------
Neh, still there.  I forgot to add the proper flags to the test case 
(which runs in a DejaGNU framework on my home box along with other PR 
test cases).  Still a problem, so reconfirming. 

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|2005-01-01 07:28:16         |2005-02-01 09:38:01
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19217


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/19217] [4.0 Regression] ICE: verify_stmts failed: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set
  2005-01-01  6:55 [Bug tree-optimization/19217] New: ICE: verify_stmts failed: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set aj at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (11 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-02-01  9:38 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-01 11:35 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-02-01 22:50 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-02-01 22:51 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-01 11:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-02-01 11:35 -------
I think we should just not do this non-statement-related check in 
verify_stmts.  Patch posted for that: 
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg00049.html 

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |patch


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19217


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/19217] [4.0 Regression] ICE: verify_stmts failed: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set
  2005-01-01  6:55 [Bug tree-optimization/19217] New: ICE: verify_stmts failed: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set aj at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (12 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-02-01 11:35 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-01 22:50 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-02-01 22:51 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-01 22:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-02-01 22:50 -------
Subject: Bug 19217

CVSROOT:	/cvs/gcc
Module name:	gcc
Changes by:	steven@gcc.gnu.org	2005-02-01 22:50:21

Modified files:
	gcc            : ChangeLog tree-cfg.c 

Log message:
	PR tree-optimization/19217
	* tree-cfg.c (verify_expr): Use the data field to see if TP was
	seen inside a PHI node.  Do not do the ADDR_EXPR check if it was.
	(verify_stmts): Pass (void*)1 as data to verify_expr to signal
	that it is walking a PHI node.

Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=2.7368&r2=2.7369
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/tree-cfg.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=2.147&r2=2.148



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19217


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/19217] [4.0 Regression] ICE: verify_stmts failed: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set
  2005-01-01  6:55 [Bug tree-optimization/19217] New: ICE: verify_stmts failed: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set aj at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (13 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-02-01 22:50 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-01 22:51 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-01 22:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-02-01 22:51 -------
. 

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19217


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-02-01 22:51 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-01-01  6:55 [Bug tree-optimization/19217] New: ICE: verify_stmts failed: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set aj at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-01  6:56 ` [Bug tree-optimization/19217] " aj at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-01  6:57 ` [Bug tree-optimization/19217] [4.0 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-01  7:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-01  7:38 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-01  7:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-01 15:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-01 15:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-04 15:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-24  9:52 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-24 13:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-24 13:43 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-01  9:38 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-01 11:35 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-01 22:50 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-01 22:51 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).