From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27484 invoked by alias); 2 Feb 2005 06:44:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27428 invoked by uid 48); 2 Feb 2005 06:44:13 -0000 Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 06:44:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050202064413.27427.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050202015319.19748.yuri@tsoft.com> References: <20050202015319.19748.yuri@tsoft.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/19748] aggressive no-inline options still cause inlining X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg00173.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-02 06:44 ------- (In reply to comment #4) > This const/pure is definitely not my case. How sure are you? And are you sure that the options are being used to compile all the code. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot | |org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19748