From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16184 invoked by alias); 8 Feb 2005 10:42:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16157 invoked by uid 48); 8 Feb 2005 10:42:47 -0000 Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 17:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050208104247.16156.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "giovannibajo at libero dot it" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20020309112600.5900.schmid@snake.iap.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> References: <20020309112600.5900.schmid@snake.iap.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/5900] [g77 & gfortran] Lapack regressions since g77 2.95.2 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg00514.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-02-08 10:42 ------- Please, try the opposite: disable optimizations through -O1 -fno-[optnam] and see if you find out something. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5900