From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21274 invoked by alias); 9 Feb 2005 00:51:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 21254 invoked by uid 48); 9 Feb 2005 00:51:22 -0000 Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 09:19:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050209005122.21253.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050207230934.19813.ctsa@u.washington.edu> References: <20050207230934.19813.ctsa@u.washington.edu> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug regression/19813] [4.0 Regression] wrong code with -finline-limit X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg00596.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-09 00:51 ------- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > This is somewhat shorter, though maybe not much: > > Does -fno-strict-aliasing make this compile and run correctly? Because if it does then this is not tree optimization problem because the tree dumps look the same with and without -fno-strict-aliasing. This would then either be a RTL, a C++ or a libstdc++ problem, I don't know which yet. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19813