From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14609 invoked by alias); 9 Feb 2005 20:09:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14498 invoked by uid 48); 9 Feb 2005 20:09:41 -0000 Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:35:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050209200941.14497.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050208143717.19823.matz@suse.de> References: <20050208143717.19823.matz@suse.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libgcj/19823] java fails with non-executable memory X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg00733.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-09 20:09 ------- I'm not so sure that the patch to always define USE_MMAP really has that effect. By my reading this patch is revision 1.36, but if you diff against 1.35 and then go look at include/private/gcconfig.h, it looks like this addition takes place in the middle of a big "#ifdef M68K". Am I misreading this? I have no explanation of why things work on my system. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19823