From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27329 invoked by alias); 9 Feb 2005 22:57:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26966 invoked by uid 48); 9 Feb 2005 22:57:11 -0000 Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 01:13:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050209225711.26965.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "falk at debian dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050209124042.19848.Thomas.Koenig@online.de> References: <20050209124042.19848.Thomas.Koenig@online.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug driver/19848] "options passed" from -verbose-asm do not adequately reflect optimization X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg00751.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From falk at debian dot org 2005-02-09 22:57 ------- There are a gazillion places where we just check "if (optimize)" without any specific flag. It would be quite a lot of work to introduce flags for all of them, and I'm not sure it's worth it... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19848