public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/18740] New: Execution-time sizeof drops side effects
@ 2004-11-30 16:38 terra at gnome dot org
2004-11-30 17:09 ` [Bug c/18740] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 more replies)
0 siblings, 8 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: terra at gnome dot org @ 2004-11-30 16:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
The program below, which is a slight variation of a program from C99
section 6.5.3.4, contains an execution-time sizeof operator and its
argument should thus be evaluated. Nevertheless, "i" in not incremented.
I would expect "i=1" to be printed. I get "i=0".
(Sun's C compiler seems to do the same thing.)
#include <stdio.h>
size_t fsize3 (int n)
{
int i = 0;
char b[1][n+3]; // Variable length array.
size_t s = sizeof (b[i++]); // Execution time sizeof.
printf ("i=%d\n", i);
return s;
}
int main()
{
size_t size;
size = fsize3(10);
return 0;
}
--
Summary: Execution-time sizeof drops side effects
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: terra at gnome dot org
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.8
GCC host triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.8
GCC target triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18740
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/18740] Execution-time sizeof drops side effects
2004-11-30 16:38 [Bug c/18740] New: Execution-time sizeof drops side effects terra at gnome dot org
@ 2004-11-30 17:09 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-11-30 22:24 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-11-30 17:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18740
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/18740] Execution-time sizeof drops side effects
2004-11-30 16:38 [Bug c/18740] New: Execution-time sizeof drops side effects terra at gnome dot org
2004-11-30 17:09 ` [Bug c/18740] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-11-30 22:24 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-11-30 22:48 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2004-11-30 22:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-11-30 22:24 -------
That's not a bug. The standard says this:
5.3.3 Sizeof [expr.sizeof]
1 The sizeof operator yields the number of bytes in the object
representation of its operand. The operand is either an expression,
which is not evaluated, or a parenthesized type-id.
W.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18740
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/18740] Execution-time sizeof drops side effects
2004-11-30 16:38 [Bug c/18740] New: Execution-time sizeof drops side effects terra at gnome dot org
2004-11-30 17:09 ` [Bug c/18740] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-11-30 22:24 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
@ 2004-11-30 22:48 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-12-01 1:44 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2004-11-30 22:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-11-30 22:48 -------
Actually, this requires more thought. I quoted from the C++ standard, but
the bug is for C, and the problem lies here: the code is
-----------------
size_t fsize3 (int n)
{
int i = 0;
char b[1][n+3]; // Variable length array.
size_t s = sizeof (b[i++]);
-----------------
Indeed, b[0] is a VLA (or is it? maybe it's the GNU extension that looks
so similar), and for that case, Morton pointed me correctly at 6.5.3.4/2 of
the C99 standard, which has a special provision for this:
If the type of the operand is a variable length array type, the
operand is evaluated; otherwise the operand is not evaluated...
Sorry for the confusion,
W.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18740
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/18740] Execution-time sizeof drops side effects
2004-11-30 16:38 [Bug c/18740] New: Execution-time sizeof drops side effects terra at gnome dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2004-11-30 22:48 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
@ 2004-12-01 1:44 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-21 11:16 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-12-01 1:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
OtherBugsDependingO| |16989
nThis| |
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-12-01 01:44:07
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18740
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/18740] Execution-time sizeof drops side effects
2004-11-30 16:38 [Bug c/18740] New: Execution-time sizeof drops side effects terra at gnome dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2004-12-01 1:44 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-12-21 11:16 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-21 13:39 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-12-21 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-21 11:15 -------
Reproducible on x86 and x86-64.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GCC build triplet|sparc-sun-solaris2.8 |*-*-*
GCC host triplet|sparc-sun-solaris2.8 |*-*-*
GCC target triplet|sparc-sun-solaris2.8 |*-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18740
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/18740] Execution-time sizeof drops side effects
2004-11-30 16:38 [Bug c/18740] New: Execution-time sizeof drops side effects terra at gnome dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2004-12-21 11:16 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-12-21 13:39 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-21 13:43 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-12 22:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-12-21 13:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-21 13:39 -------
Not a bug. Sizeof *never* has side effects.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18740
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/18740] Execution-time sizeof drops side effects
2004-11-30 16:38 [Bug c/18740] New: Execution-time sizeof drops side effects terra at gnome dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2004-12-21 13:39 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-12-21 13:43 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-12 22:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-12-21 13:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-21 13:43 -------
I'm wrong. What a stupid thing to do to the C language.
Someone should be smacked.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18740
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/18740] Execution-time sizeof drops side effects
2004-11-30 16:38 [Bug c/18740] New: Execution-time sizeof drops side effects terra at gnome dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2004-12-21 13:43 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-12 22:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-12 22:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18740
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/18740] Execution-time sizeof drops side effects
[not found] <bug-18740-9033@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2006-05-09 0:47 ` mrs at apple dot com
2006-05-18 18:22 ` mrs at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-06-04 17:01 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-06-04 17:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 17:01 -------
Fixed for 4.2.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18740
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/18740] Execution-time sizeof drops side effects
[not found] <bug-18740-9033@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2006-05-09 0:47 ` mrs at apple dot com
@ 2006-05-18 18:22 ` mrs at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-04 17:01 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: mrs at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-05-18 18:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from mrs at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-18 18:22 -------
Subject: Bug 18740
Author: mrs
Date: Thu May 18 18:22:12 2006
New Revision: 113888
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113888
Log:
Fix up vla, vm and [*] sematics.
PR c/18740
PR c/7948
PR c/25802
* c-tree.h (struct c_arg_info): Add had_vla_unspec.
(c_vla_unspec_p): Add.
(c_vla_type_p): Add.
* c-decl.c (struct c_scope): Add had_vla_unspec.
(build_array_declarator): Add support for [*].
(grokdeclarator): Likewise.
(grokparms): Likewise.
(get_parm_info): Likewise.
* c-objc-common.c (c_vla_unspec_p): Likewise.
* c-objc-common.h (LANG_HOOKS_TREE_INLINING_VAR_MOD_TYPE_P): Likewise.
* c-parser.c (c_parser_typeof_specifier): Evaluate arguments to
typeof when argument is a variably modified type not inside sizeof or
alignof.
(c_parser_direct_declarator_inner): Propagate errors.
(c_parser_sizeof_expression): Add support for [*].
* c-typeck.c (c_vla_type_p): Add.
(composite_type): Add support for vla compositing.
(comptypes_internal): Add support for vla compatibility.
(c_expr_sizeof_expr): Evaluate vla arguments.
* tree.c (variably_modified_type_p): Update comment for [*].
testsuite:
* gcc.dg/c90-arraydecl-1.c: Update for vla, vm [*] fixups.
* gcc.dg/vla-4.c: Add.
* gcc.dg/vla-5.c: Add.
* gcc.dg/vla-6.c: Add.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vla-4.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vla-5.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vla-6.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/c-decl.c
trunk/gcc/c-objc-common.c
trunk/gcc/c-objc-common.h
trunk/gcc/c-parser.c
trunk/gcc/c-tree.h
trunk/gcc/c-typeck.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c90-arraydecl-1.c
trunk/gcc/tree.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18740
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/18740] Execution-time sizeof drops side effects
[not found] <bug-18740-9033@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2006-05-09 0:47 ` mrs at apple dot com
2006-05-18 18:22 ` mrs at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-04 17:01 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: mrs at apple dot com @ 2006-05-09 0:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from mrs at apple dot com 2006-05-09 00:47 -------
I have a fix for this.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18740
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-06-04 17:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-11-30 16:38 [Bug c/18740] New: Execution-time sizeof drops side effects terra at gnome dot org
2004-11-30 17:09 ` [Bug c/18740] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-11-30 22:24 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-11-30 22:48 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-12-01 1:44 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-21 11:16 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-21 13:39 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-21 13:43 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-12 22:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
[not found] <bug-18740-9033@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2006-05-09 0:47 ` mrs at apple dot com
2006-05-18 18:22 ` mrs at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-04 17:01 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).