From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-130655-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 2100 invoked by alias); 13 Feb 2005 16:53:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 1969 invoked by uid 48); 13 Feb 2005 16:52:55 -0000
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 23:44:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20050213165255.1968.qmail@sourceware.org>
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20050213162215.19937.schwab@suse.de>
References: <20050213162215.19937.schwab@suse.de>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/19937] [4.0 regression] Wrong loop exit
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg01335.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-02-13 16:52 -------
I think this is an ivopt bug:
  if (i_3 != 4294967295) goto <L0>; else goto <L10>;


i_3 is signed but the expression (I think), 4294967295, is unsigned, maybe we are missing a 
fold_convert.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19937