From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24756 invoked by alias); 14 Feb 2005 20:32:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24696 invoked by uid 48); 14 Feb 2005 20:32:23 -0000 Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 00:54:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050214203223.24695.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "schlie at comcast dot net" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050212040652.19920.schlie@comcast.net> References: <20050212040652.19920.schlie@comcast.net> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/19920] [4.0 Regression] build broken on several targets due to recent 'DC' type update to libgcc2 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg01516.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-02-14 20:32 ------- (In reply to comment #9) > None of the primary/secondary targets are known to fail so removing the target milestone. Although I understand none of the failures are on primary/secondary targets, might someone who is most familiar with, and intends to hopefully maintain libgcc2 have a chance to look at this, in hopes it may be remedied relatively easily in a way consistent with their longer term plans? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19920