public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/19966] New: Misleading message "must take exactly one argument"
@ 2005-02-15 13:24 reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-02-15 13:25 ` [Bug c++/19966] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-15 13:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

The following invalid code snippet causes a bogus error message:

==============================
struct A
{
    static operator int();
};
==============================

bug.cc:3: error: 'static A::operator int()' must be a nonstatic member function
bug.cc:3: error: 'static A::operator int()' must take exactly one argument

The first part is ok, but the second part is bogus, as the operator
(once made non-static) will take no argument. Well, the this-pointer
could be counted as an argument, but this is nevertheless confusing
for the user. Especially, since the second error message will indeed
go away if one adds a parameter.

-- 
           Summary: Misleading message "must take exactly one argument"
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.0.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: diagnostic, monitored
          Severity: minor
          Priority: P2
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19966


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/19966] Misleading message "must take exactly one argument"
  2005-02-15 13:24 [Bug c++/19966] New: Misleading message "must take exactly one argument" reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-15 13:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-03-11 18:27 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-15 13:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-02-15 01:18 -------
Confirmed.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2005-02-15 01:18:56
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19966


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/19966] Misleading message "must take exactly one argument"
  2005-02-15 13:24 [Bug c++/19966] New: Misleading message "must take exactly one argument" reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-02-15 13:25 ` [Bug c++/19966] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-03-11 18:27 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
  2005-03-17 14:39 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pcarlini at suse dot de @ 2005-03-11 18:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de  2005-03-11 18:27 -------
Maybe I can fix this one too...

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |pcarlini at suse dot de
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19966


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/19966] Misleading message "must take exactly one argument"
  2005-02-15 13:24 [Bug c++/19966] New: Misleading message "must take exactly one argument" reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-02-15 13:25 ` [Bug c++/19966] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-03-11 18:27 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
@ 2005-03-17 14:39 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-03-17 14:44 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-03-17 14:46 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-03-17 14:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-03-17 14:38 -------
Subject: Bug 19966

CVSROOT:	/cvs/gcc
Module name:	gcc
Changes by:	paolo@gcc.gnu.org	2005-03-17 14:37:10

Modified files:
	gcc/cp         : ChangeLog cp-tree.h decl.c 

Log message:
	2005-03-17  Paolo Carlini  <pcarlini@suse.de>
	
	PR c++/19966
	* cp-tree.h (grok_op_properties): Change return type to void.
	* decl.c (grok_op_properties): Return early - don't check the
	arity - in case of a static member or an operator that cannot
	be non-member; tidy a bit.

Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.4664&r2=1.4665
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.1110&r2=1.1111
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/decl.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.1378&r2=1.1379



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19966


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/19966] Misleading message "must take exactly one argument"
  2005-02-15 13:24 [Bug c++/19966] New: Misleading message "must take exactly one argument" reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-03-17 14:39 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-03-17 14:44 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-03-17 14:46 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-03-17 14:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-03-17 14:40 -------
Subject: Bug 19966

CVSROOT:	/cvs/gcc
Module name:	gcc
Changes by:	paolo@gcc.gnu.org	2005-03-17 14:39:16

Modified files:
	gcc/testsuite  : ChangeLog 
Added files:
	gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/overload: operator2.C 

Log message:
	2005-03-17  Paolo Carlini  <pcarlini@suse.de>
	
	PR c++/19966
	* g++.dg/overload/operator2.C: New test.

Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.5177&r2=1.5178
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/overload/operator2.C.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19966


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/19966] Misleading message "must take exactly one argument"
  2005-02-15 13:24 [Bug c++/19966] New: Misleading message "must take exactly one argument" reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-03-17 14:44 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-03-17 14:46 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pcarlini at suse dot de @ 2005-03-17 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de  2005-03-17 14:42 -------
Fixed.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.1.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19966


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-03-17 14:46 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-02-15 13:24 [Bug c++/19966] New: Misleading message "must take exactly one argument" reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-15 13:25 ` [Bug c++/19966] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-11 18:27 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2005-03-17 14:39 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-17 14:44 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-17 14:46 ` pcarlini at suse dot de

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).