From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20504 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2005 23:17:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20482 invoked by uid 48); 16 Feb 2005 23:17:13 -0000 Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050216231713.20481.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "rth at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050215161817.19974.Thomas.Koenig@online.de> References: <20050215161817.19974.Thomas.Koenig@online.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/19974] incorrect complex division on ia-64 with flag_complex_method = 2 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg01877.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16 23:17 ------- Confirmed. It's an ia64-specific miscompilation. Doesn't happen if libgcc is built with -O0 instead of -O2. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Component|middle-end |target Ever Confirmed| |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-02-16 23:17:12 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19974