From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18278 invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2005 09:42:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16977 invoked by uid 48); 17 Feb 2005 09:42:04 -0000 Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 15:47:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050217094204.16976.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050215161817.19974.Thomas.Koenig@online.de> References: <20050215161817.19974.Thomas.Koenig@online.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/19974] incorrect complex division on ia-64 with flag_complex_method = 2 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg01918.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de 2005-02-17 09:42 ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Using Mathematica I get for > (10^20 + 10^12 I)/(1 - 10^-8) = 10^20 + 2 * 10^12 I > > so really neither of them are mathematically correct. The test case was (10^20-10^12*I)/(1-10^(-8)*I), which is 10^20, obviously. For what it is worth, ifort also gets 18059 as the result. I'll do some checking to see what this should really be. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19974