From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5669 invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2005 20:06:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5546 invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2005 20:05:54 -0000 Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 23:52:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050217200554.5545.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050217033541.20020.gary@intrepid.com> References: <20050217033541.20020.gary@intrepid.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/20020] x86_64 - 128 bit structs not targeted to TImode X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg02004.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-02-17 20:05 ------- Subject: Re: x86_64 - 128 bit structs not targeted to TImode On Feb 17, 2005, at 2:35 PM, gary at intrepid dot com wrote: > The MAX_FIXED_REC_SIZE defintion is a relatively recent addition to > config/rs6000.h (and from a quick review of the cvs log, it seems that > this > change hasn't yet been incorporated into a release.) Just fyi. Yes so, just a note the patch to fix this if it is approved will always have to go on the mainline. Also note MAX_FIXED_MODE_SIZE was changed on rs6000 for a reason and not for an optimization issue. -- Pinski -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20020