From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23552 invoked by alias); 22 Feb 2005 11:24:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23498 invoked by uid 48); 22 Feb 2005 11:24:28 -0000 Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:02:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050222112428.23497.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pcarlini at suse dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030502212600.10606.sebor@roguewave.com> References: <20030502212600.10606.sebor@roguewave.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/10606] uncaught_exception() returns false too early X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg02629.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-02-22 11:24 ------- Richard, your fix is causing the regression of libstdc++/14026, can you please have a look again to both?!? Thanks in advance... -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10606