public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/19693] New: optimization problem with LAPACK routine cgtts2.f
@ 2005-01-29 13:48 billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-29 13:51 ` [Bug fortran/19693] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (9 more replies)
  0 siblings, 10 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-29 13:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

With gfortran 20050129 I get a testsuite failure at -O2 that I don't see at -
O0.  The failure is in the CGT tests in ctest.in:

 CGT:  General tridiagonal
 Matrix types (1-6 have specified condition numbers):
    1. Diagonal                        7. Random, unspecified CNDNUM
    2. Random, CNDNUM = 2              8. First column zero
    3. Random, CNDNUM = sqrt(0.1/EPS)  9. Last column zero
    4. Random, CNDNUM = 0.1/EPS       10. Last n/2 columns zero
    5. Scaled near underflow          11. Scaled near underflow
    6. Scaled near overflow           12. Scaled near overflow
 Test ratios:
    1: norm( L * U - A )  / ( N * norm(A) * EPS )
    2: norm( B - A * X )  / ( norm(A) * norm(X) * EPS )
    3: norm( X - XACT )   / ( norm(XACT) * CNDNUM * EPS )
    4: norm( X - XACT )   / ( norm(XACT) * CNDNUM * EPS ), refined
    5: norm( X - XACT )   / ( norm(XACT) * (error bound) )
    6: (backward error)   / EPS
    7: RCOND * CNDNUM - 1.0
 Messages:
 NORM ='O', N =    1,           type  5, test( 7) =  0.16777E+08
 NORM ='I', N =    1,           type  5, test( 7) =  0.16777E+08
 TRANS='N', N =    1, NRHS=  1, type  5, test( 3) = 

I have reduced it to the miscompilation of routine cgtts2.f at -O2.  I have 
isolated a single failing case, but if I try to change the routine the problem 
evaporates.

Attached is:
 - driv.f: a small driver program
 - cgtts2.f: the LAPACK routine with the problem.

To reproduce:

gfortran -o pass.exe -O0 driv.f cgtts2.f
gfortran -o fail.exe -O0 driv.f cgtts2.f
./pass
 B(1,1) =  ( 4.0564819E+31,  0.000000    )

./fail
At line 15 of file driv.f
Internal Error: printf is broken
 B(1,1) =  (

Note:  The internal error is PR 19363

-- 
           Summary: optimization problem with LAPACK routine cgtts2.f
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.0.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: fortran
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: i686-pc-cygwin
  GCC host triplet: i686-pc-cygwin
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-cygwin


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19693


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/19693] optimization problem with LAPACK routine cgtts2.f
  2005-01-29 13:48 [Bug fortran/19693] New: optimization problem with LAPACK routine cgtts2.f billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-29 13:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-29 13:51 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-29 13:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |wrong-code


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19693


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/19693] optimization problem with LAPACK routine cgtts2.f
  2005-01-29 13:48 [Bug fortran/19693] New: optimization problem with LAPACK routine cgtts2.f billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-29 13:51 ` [Bug fortran/19693] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-29 13:51 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-29 13:52 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-29 13:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-29 13:51 -------
Created an attachment (id=8099)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8099&action=view)
driv.f: test driver

driv.f is driver routine

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19693


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/19693] optimization problem with LAPACK routine cgtts2.f
  2005-01-29 13:48 [Bug fortran/19693] New: optimization problem with LAPACK routine cgtts2.f billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-29 13:51 ` [Bug fortran/19693] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-29 13:51 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-29 13:52 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-29 13:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-29 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-29 13:52 -------
Created an attachment (id=8100)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8100&action=view)
cgtts2.f is LAPACK routine that is miscompiled

cgtts2.f is LAPACK routine that is miscompiled

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19693


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/19693] optimization problem with LAPACK routine cgtts2.f
  2005-01-29 13:48 [Bug fortran/19693] New: optimization problem with LAPACK routine cgtts2.f billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-01-29 13:52 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-29 13:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-30 12:15 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-29 13:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-29 13:55 -------
At -O0 on powerpc-darwin I get:
 B(1,1) =  (     +Infinity,           NaN)



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19693


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/19693] optimization problem with LAPACK routine cgtts2.f
  2005-01-29 13:48 [Bug fortran/19693] New: optimization problem with LAPACK routine cgtts2.f billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-01-29 13:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-30 12:15 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-30 13:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-30 12:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-30 12:15 -------
This goes away when we set flag_complex_divide_method = 1 in toplev.c - 
overflow in complex division - which is consistent with the magnitude of the 
inputs.

PR 18902 again.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |18902
OtherBugsDependingO|                            |5900
              nThis|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19693


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/19693] optimization problem with LAPACK routine cgtts2.f
  2005-01-29 13:48 [Bug fortran/19693] New: optimization problem with LAPACK routine cgtts2.f billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-01-30 12:15 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-30 13:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-02-24 14:28 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-30 13:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2005-01-30 13:57:14
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19693


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/19693] optimization problem with LAPACK routine cgtts2.f
  2005-01-29 13:48 [Bug fortran/19693] New: optimization problem with LAPACK routine cgtts2.f billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-01-30 13:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-24 14:28 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-03-01 20:22 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-24 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
Bug 19693 depends on bug 18902, which changed state.

Bug 18902 Summary: Naive (default) complex division algorithm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18902

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19693


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/19693] optimization problem with LAPACK routine cgtts2.f
  2005-01-29 13:48 [Bug fortran/19693] New: optimization problem with LAPACK routine cgtts2.f billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-02-24 14:28 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-03-01 20:22 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-03-02  0:09 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-04-20  2:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-03-01 20:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-03-01 20:22 -------
Can this be closed with the recent change of default complex divide algorithm?

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19693


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/19693] optimization problem with LAPACK routine cgtts2.f
  2005-01-29 13:48 [Bug fortran/19693] New: optimization problem with LAPACK routine cgtts2.f billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-03-01 20:22 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-03-02  0:09 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-04-20  2:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-03-02  0:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-03-02 00:07 -------
Fixed by changes to complex divide algorithm.  
See comment #46 on PR5900 for LAPACK testsuite results at -O2.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19693


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/19693] optimization problem with LAPACK routine cgtts2.f
  2005-01-29 13:48 [Bug fortran/19693] New: optimization problem with LAPACK routine cgtts2.f billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-03-02  0:09 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-04-20  2:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-04-20  2:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.0.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19693


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-04-20  2:35 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-01-29 13:48 [Bug fortran/19693] New: optimization problem with LAPACK routine cgtts2.f billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-29 13:51 ` [Bug fortran/19693] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-29 13:51 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-29 13:52 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-29 13:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-30 12:15 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-30 13:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-24 14:28 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-01 20:22 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-02  0:09 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-20  2:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).