public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rth at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/5900] [g77 & gfortran] Lapack regressions since g77 2.95.2
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:31:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050224092540.17367.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020309112600.5900.schmid@snake.iap.physik.tu-darmstadt.de>
--
Bug 5900 depends on bug 18902, which changed state.
Bug 18902 Summary: Naive (default) complex division algorithm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18902
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5900
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-24 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20020309112600.5900.schmid@snake.iap.physik.tu-darmstadt.de>
2003-05-25 4:06 ` [Bug fortran/5900] Lapack regressions for g77 3.1 dhazeghi@yahoo.com
2003-05-25 4:29 ` pinskia@physics.uc.edu
2003-07-05 16:57 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
2003-08-22 19:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-08-23 3:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-23 18:40 ` [Bug fortran/5900] [g77] " tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-23 19:37 ` [Bug fortran/5900] [g77 & gfortran] Lapack regressions since g77 2.95.2 toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
2004-09-27 19:56 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-14 16:08 ` Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2004-12-14 16:14 ` Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2005-01-04 6:29 ` jvdelisle at verizon dot net
2005-01-04 7:15 ` jvdelisle at verizon dot net
2005-01-04 9:30 ` Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2005-01-06 14:39 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-08 14:41 ` Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2005-01-10 4:46 ` jvdelisle at verizon dot net
2005-01-12 4:22 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2005-01-20 10:58 ` Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2005-01-20 11:01 ` Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2005-01-20 22:22 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-20 22:38 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-21 1:18 ` jvdelisle at verizon dot net
2005-01-24 9:13 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-24 22:48 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-25 0:15 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-25 2:07 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-25 6:00 ` jvdelisle at verizon dot net
2005-01-26 9:22 ` Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2005-01-26 9:42 ` Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2005-01-31 14:39 ` Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2005-02-01 7:52 ` jvdelisle at verizon dot net
2005-02-01 8:10 ` jvdelisle at verizon dot net
2005-02-02 3:29 ` jvdelisle at verizon dot net
2005-02-07 22:06 ` Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2005-02-08 0:15 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2005-02-08 14:12 ` jvdelisle at verizon dot net
2005-02-08 15:12 ` jvdelisle at verizon dot net
2005-02-08 16:04 ` Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2005-02-08 17:16 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2005-02-08 21:35 ` Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2005-02-08 23:57 ` Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2005-02-09 13:58 ` Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2005-02-09 18:08 ` Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2005-02-10 16:14 ` Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2005-02-10 23:11 ` Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2005-02-11 13:39 ` jvdelisle at verizon dot net
2005-02-11 15:20 ` jvdelisle at verizon dot net
2005-02-11 15:25 ` jvdelisle at verizon dot net
2005-02-11 17:22 ` Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2005-02-11 17:23 ` Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2005-02-19 12:58 ` wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-24 14:31 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2005-02-28 14:55 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-02 0:07 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-02 0:09 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-02 3:56 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-31 21:38 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-29 14:03 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-30 5:06 ` jvdelisle at verizon dot net
2005-05-02 10:06 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-06-08 6:04 ` jvdelisle at verizon dot net
[not found] <bug-5900-849@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-03 12:50 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-17 2:02 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-17 2:45 ` david dot billinghurst at comalco dot riotinto dot com dot au
2005-10-23 21:19 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-01 2:50 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-01 7:31 ` paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr
2006-06-02 0:17 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050224092540.17367.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).