From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5749 invoked by alias); 25 Feb 2005 01:12:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5724 invoked by uid 48); 25 Feb 2005 01:12:34 -0000 Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:33:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050225011234.5715.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "hp at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050225005902.20204.hp@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20050225005902.20204.hp@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/20204] [4.0 regression] miscompilation of asm-declared registers X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg03088.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-25 01:12 ------- Well, I can't follow the code, but here are all the gcc changes in that time-frame: diff -p -c -r2.7576 -r2.7578 *** ChangeLog 24 Feb 2005 01:54:58 -0000 2.7576 --- ChangeLog 24 Feb 2005 14:17:25 -0000 2.7578 *************** *** 1,3 **** --- 1,19 ---- + 2005-02-24 Diego Novillo + + * tree-into-ssa.c: Re-organize internal functions. + + 2005-02-24 Richard Henderson + + PR middle-end/18902 + * c-opts.c (c_common_post_options): Set flag_complex_method to 2 + for c99. + * common.opt (fcx-limited-range): New. + * opts.c (set_fast_math_flags): Set flag_cx_limited_range. + * toplev.c (flag_complex_method): Initialize to 1. + (process_options): Set flag_complex_method to 0 if + flag_cx_limited_range. + * doc/invoke.texi (-fcx-limited-range): New. + 2005-02-24 Kazu Hirata * cse.c (delete_trivially_dead_insns): Speed up by using I can certainly understand that a typo changed some assigmnent such that asm-declared registers are mishandled. Pretty please. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20204