From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-132459-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 19803 invoked by alias); 25 Feb 2005 14:48:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 19419 invoked by uid 48); 25 Feb 2005 14:48:09 -0000
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 19:35:00 -0000
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Message-ID: <20050225144806.20208.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/20208] New: [4.0 Regression] No array-to-pointer decay happens for template functions
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg03139.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

At -O1 and above, the following code ICE because well, the same reason why PR 2892 fails currently 
really:
extern "C" void abort();

template <typename T>
inline void *Foo (T arg) { return &arg[0]; }

int main () {
  int bry[2];
  if (Foo<int[2]>(bry) != bry)
    abort();
}

I filed this a seperate bug because well the ICE is a regression even though fixing PR 2892 will fix this 
also.

-- 
           Summary: [4.0 Regression] No array-to-pointer decay happens for
                    template functions
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.0.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
OtherBugsDependingO 2892
             nThis:


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20208