From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-132489-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 30335 invoked by alias); 25 Feb 2005 16:51:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 29298 invoked by uid 48); 25 Feb 2005 16:48:54 -0000
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 23:03:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20050225164854.29297.qmail@sourceware.org>
From: "dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20050225005902.20204.hp@gcc.gnu.org>
References: <20050225005902.20204.hp@gcc.gnu.org>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/20204] [4.0 regression] miscompilation of asm-declared registers
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg03169.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-02-25 16:48 -------
(In reply to comment #9)
> I've confirmed on this other machine that the update caused the same breakage.
> 
Ah, yes.  I see it now.  The reorg tickled a bug in the renamer:

# n_21 = V_MUST_DEF <n_18>
n = D.1158_28
...
n_48 = PHI <n_37, n21>
<L2>:
...
# VUSE <n_21>
n.5_40 = n;


That's wrong.  The last VUSE should be VUSE <n_48>.  Virtual operands should
always be in FUD-chain form.

Working on a fix.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |dot org                     |org
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20204