public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/19937] New: [4.0 regression] Wrong loop exit
@ 2005-02-13 22:20 schwab at suse dot de
2005-02-13 22:55 ` [Bug c/19937] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (17 more replies)
0 siblings, 18 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: schwab at suse dot de @ 2005-02-13 22:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
$ cat loop.c
typedef __SIZE_TYPE__ size_t;
extern void abort (void);
extern size_t strlen (const char *);
extern int strncmp (const char *, const char *, size_t);
int foo (const char *name)
{
static const char *debug_sec_names [] =
{
".debug",
".gnu.linkonce.wi.",
".line",
".stab"
};
int i;
int flags = 0;
for (i = sizeof (debug_sec_names) / sizeof (debug_sec_names[0]); i--;)
if (strncmp (name, debug_sec_names[i], strlen (debug_sec_names[i])) == 0)
break;
if (i >= 0)
flags |= 0x10000;
return flags;
}
int main (void)
{
if (foo (".interp") == 0x10000)
abort ();
return 0;
}
$ gcc -O2 loop.c
$ ./a.out
Aborted
--
Summary: [4.0 regression] Wrong loop exit
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: critical
Priority: P2
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: schwab at suse dot de
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: ia64-suse-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19937
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/19937] [4.0 regression] Wrong loop exit
2005-02-13 22:20 [Bug c/19937] New: [4.0 regression] Wrong loop exit schwab at suse dot de
@ 2005-02-13 22:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-13 23:03 ` [Bug tree-optimization/19937] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (16 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-13 22:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-13 16:25 -------
Confirmed, looking for where it is miscompiled.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-02-13 16:25:13
date| |
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19937
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/19937] [4.0 regression] Wrong loop exit
2005-02-13 22:20 [Bug c/19937] New: [4.0 regression] Wrong loop exit schwab at suse dot de
2005-02-13 22:55 ` [Bug c/19937] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-13 23:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-13 23:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (15 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-13 23:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-13 16:44 -------
Reduced testcase:
void abort (void);
int g(void)
{
return 1;
}
int main (void)
{
int i;
for (i = 4; i--;)
if (g () == 0)
break;
if (i >= 0)
abort ();
return 0;
}
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Component|c |tree-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19937
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/19937] [4.0 regression] Wrong loop exit
2005-02-13 22:20 [Bug c/19937] New: [4.0 regression] Wrong loop exit schwab at suse dot de
2005-02-13 22:55 ` [Bug c/19937] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-13 23:03 ` [Bug tree-optimization/19937] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-13 23:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-14 2:42 ` schwab at suse dot de
` (14 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-13 23:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-13 16:52 -------
I think this is an ivopt bug:
if (i_3 != 4294967295) goto <L0>; else goto <L10>;
i_3 is signed but the expression (I think), 4294967295, is unsigned, maybe we are missing a
fold_convert.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19937
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/19937] [4.0 regression] Wrong loop exit
2005-02-13 22:20 [Bug c/19937] New: [4.0 regression] Wrong loop exit schwab at suse dot de
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-02-13 23:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-14 2:42 ` schwab at suse dot de
2005-02-14 5:16 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: schwab at suse dot de @ 2005-02-14 2:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2005-02-13 19:17 -------
Broken by this patch:
2005-02-06 Zdenek Dvorak <dvorakz@suse.cz>
* tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c (rewrite_use_nonlinear_expr): Do not add
unnecessary cast to original induction variable increments.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19937
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/19937] [4.0 regression] Wrong loop exit
2005-02-13 22:20 [Bug c/19937] New: [4.0 regression] Wrong loop exit schwab at suse dot de
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-02-14 2:42 ` schwab at suse dot de
@ 2005-02-14 5:16 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-14 10:22 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-14 5:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19937
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/19937] [4.0 regression] Wrong loop exit
2005-02-13 22:20 [Bug c/19937] New: [4.0 regression] Wrong loop exit schwab at suse dot de
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2005-02-14 5:16 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-14 10:22 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-14 15:03 ` rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz
` (11 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-14 10:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-13 22:20 -------
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg00657.html
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19937
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/19937] [4.0 regression] Wrong loop exit
2005-02-13 22:20 [Bug c/19937] New: [4.0 regression] Wrong loop exit schwab at suse dot de
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2005-02-14 15:03 ` rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz
@ 2005-02-14 15:03 ` schlie at comcast dot net
2005-02-18 14:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: schlie at comcast dot net @ 2005-02-14 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-02-14 06:04 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg00657.html
it may be worth noting that compare for equivelence/non-equivelence,
is insensitive to the sign of equivelent rank integers, although relative
(< >) compares are, but it does'nt seem that it's recognized when
comparision operations are constructed?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19937
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/19937] [4.0 regression] Wrong loop exit
2005-02-13 22:20 [Bug c/19937] New: [4.0 regression] Wrong loop exit schwab at suse dot de
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2005-02-14 10:22 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-14 15:03 ` rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz
2005-02-14 15:03 ` schlie at comcast dot net
` (10 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz @ 2005-02-14 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz 2005-02-14 07:03 -------
Subject: Re: [4.0 regression] Wrong loop exit
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg00657.html
>
> it may be worth noting that compare for equivelence/non-equivelence,
> is insensitive to the sign of equivelent rank integers, although relative
> (< >) compares are, but it does'nt seem that it's recognized when
> comparision operations are constructed?
I don't understand the comment. Comparisons constructed due to
may_eliminate_iv are always either EQ_EXPRs or NE_EXPRs. Comparing
directly with a value in a different type (regardless of what comparison
operator is used) is however always an invalid gimple.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19937
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/19937] [4.0 regression] Wrong loop exit
2005-02-13 22:20 [Bug c/19937] New: [4.0 regression] Wrong loop exit schwab at suse dot de
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2005-02-14 15:03 ` schlie at comcast dot net
@ 2005-02-18 14:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-18 15:55 ` [Bug tree-optimization/19937] [4.0 regression] Wrong loop exit (causes binutils to fail) schlie at comcast dot net
` (8 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-18 14:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-18 04:14 -------
*** Bug 20048 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |amodra at bigpond dot net
| |dot au
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19937
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/19937] [4.0 regression] Wrong loop exit (causes binutils to fail)
2005-02-13 22:20 [Bug c/19937] New: [4.0 regression] Wrong loop exit schwab at suse dot de
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2005-02-18 14:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-18 15:55 ` schlie at comcast dot net
2005-02-20 22:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: schlie at comcast dot net @ 2005-02-18 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-02-18 04:52 -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> Subject: Re: [4.0 regression] Wrong loop exit
> I don't understand the comment. Comparisons constructed due to
> may_eliminate_iv are always either EQ_EXPRs or NE_EXPRs. Comparing
> directly with a value in a different type (regardless of what comparison
> operator is used) is however always an invalid gimple.
Yes you're correct, my comment was misguided, and simply wrong.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19937
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/19937] [4.0 regression] Wrong loop exit (causes binutils to fail)
2005-02-13 22:20 [Bug c/19937] New: [4.0 regression] Wrong loop exit schwab at suse dot de
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2005-02-18 15:55 ` [Bug tree-optimization/19937] [4.0 regression] Wrong loop exit (causes binutils to fail) schlie at comcast dot net
@ 2005-02-20 22:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-23 16:19 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-20 22:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-20 15:37 -------
*** Bug 20106 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pluto at pld-linux dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19937
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/19937] [4.0 regression] Wrong loop exit (causes binutils to fail)
2005-02-13 22:20 [Bug c/19937] New: [4.0 regression] Wrong loop exit schwab at suse dot de
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2005-02-20 22:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-23 16:19 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-25 16:55 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-23 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 12:50 -------
The patch has been approved in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg01232.html
Zdenek, are you going to commit it?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19937
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/19937] [4.0 regression] Wrong loop exit (causes binutils to fail)
2005-02-13 22:20 [Bug c/19937] New: [4.0 regression] Wrong loop exit schwab at suse dot de
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2005-02-23 16:19 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-25 16:55 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-25 16:56 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-25 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-25 12:08 -------
Subject: Bug 19937
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Changes by: rakdver@gcc.gnu.org 2005-02-25 12:07:17
Modified files:
gcc : ChangeLog tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c
Log message:
PR tree-optimization/19937
* tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c (rewrite_use_compare): Cast the final value
to the type of the induction variable.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=2.7592&r2=2.7593
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=2.49&r2=2.50
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19937
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/19937] [4.0 regression] Wrong loop exit (causes binutils to fail)
2005-02-13 22:20 [Bug c/19937] New: [4.0 regression] Wrong loop exit schwab at suse dot de
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2005-02-25 16:55 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-25 16:56 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-25 17:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-25 16:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-25 12:10 -------
Fixed.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19937
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/19937] [4.0 regression] Wrong loop exit (causes binutils to fail)
2005-02-13 22:20 [Bug c/19937] New: [4.0 regression] Wrong loop exit schwab at suse dot de
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2005-02-25 16:56 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-25 17:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-25 18:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-25 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-25 12:29 -------
Yes but only on the mainline, 4.0 is now branched.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19937
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/19937] [4.0 regression] Wrong loop exit (causes binutils to fail)
2005-02-13 22:20 [Bug c/19937] New: [4.0 regression] Wrong loop exit schwab at suse dot de
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2005-02-25 17:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-25 18:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-26 0:02 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-26 0:16 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-25 18:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |ASSIGNED
Known to fail| |4.0.0
Known to work| |4.1.0 3.4.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19937
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/19937] [4.0 regression] Wrong loop exit (causes binutils to fail)
2005-02-13 22:20 [Bug c/19937] New: [4.0 regression] Wrong loop exit schwab at suse dot de
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2005-02-25 18:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-26 0:02 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-26 0:16 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-26 0:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-25 16:58 -------
Subject: Bug 19937
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: rakdver@gcc.gnu.org 2005-02-25 16:56:28
Modified files:
gcc : ChangeLog tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c
Log message:
PR tree-optimization/19937
* tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c (rewrite_use_compare): Cast the final value
to the type of the induction variable.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=2.7592&r2=2.7592.2.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=2.49&r2=2.49.2.1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19937
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/19937] [4.0 regression] Wrong loop exit (causes binutils to fail)
2005-02-13 22:20 [Bug c/19937] New: [4.0 regression] Wrong loop exit schwab at suse dot de
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2005-02-26 0:02 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-26 0:16 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-26 0:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-25 17:04 -------
Also in 4.0.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19937
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-02-25 17:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-02-13 22:20 [Bug c/19937] New: [4.0 regression] Wrong loop exit schwab at suse dot de
2005-02-13 22:55 ` [Bug c/19937] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-13 23:03 ` [Bug tree-optimization/19937] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-13 23:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-14 2:42 ` schwab at suse dot de
2005-02-14 5:16 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-14 10:22 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-14 15:03 ` rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz
2005-02-14 15:03 ` schlie at comcast dot net
2005-02-18 14:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-18 15:55 ` [Bug tree-optimization/19937] [4.0 regression] Wrong loop exit (causes binutils to fail) schlie at comcast dot net
2005-02-20 22:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-23 16:19 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-25 16:55 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-25 16:56 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-25 17:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-25 18:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-26 0:02 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-26 0:16 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).