From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21995 invoked by alias); 25 Feb 2005 19:00:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 21920 invoked by uid 48); 25 Feb 2005 18:59:54 -0000 Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 01:24:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050225185954.21919.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "giovannibajo at libero dot it" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050225161912.20211.amylaar@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20050225161912.20211.amylaar@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/20211] autoincrement generation is poor X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg03181.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-02-25 18:59 ------- What is the compile-time impact of this patch on cc-i compilation, the usual C++ testcases, and SPEC? I am sure this is something worthwile to mention for a review. And BTW, out of curiosity, does the new pass have to live in regmove.c? -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed| |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-02-25 18:59:53 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20211