From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17266 invoked by alias); 1 Mar 2005 01:23:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17242 invoked by uid 48); 1 Mar 2005 01:23:07 -0000 Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 01:23:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050301012307.17241.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "lothar at xcerla dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050215214329.19985.lothar@xcerla.com> References: <20050215214329.19985.lothar@xcerla.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/19985] executables created with -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage segfault in gcov_exit () X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00019.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From lothar at xcerla dot com 2005-03-01 01:23 ------- A bug that creates wrong code is critical for me. As our application depends on dynamically loading libraries, there's simply NO workaround for this bug. We can NOT execute any executables built with code coverage with either 3.4.1 or 4.0.0. I am really worried that 4.0.0 may get released without fully working code coverage. P.S. I tried to mark the bug as "waiting for feedback", but it said I do not have the permissions. Am I not the owner of the bug? If possible mark the bug as "waiting for feedback" and the Target Milestone to 4.0.0. Thanks -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |critical Keywords| |wrong-code Known to fail| |3.4.1 4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19985