From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7515 invoked by alias); 1 Mar 2005 18:09:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7459 invoked by uid 48); 1 Mar 2005 18:09:14 -0000 Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 18:09:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050301180914.7456.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041222050828.19126.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20041222050828.19126.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/19126] Missed IV optimization (redundant instruction in loop) X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00103.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01 18:09 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > I get different asm for AMD64 as well: Since AMD64 and x86 have lea, it is not as impressive on PPC or any other target that does have a+b*c instructions. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19126