public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug bootstrap/20166] New: Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem
@ 2005-02-23 18:36 rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-02-23 18:39 ` [Bug target/20166] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (15 more replies)
  0 siblings, 16 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-23 18:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

The fix to PR19333 uncovered a problem in the Debian (only?) shipped pthread.h
file which breaks bootstrapping on this platform:

./xgcc -B./ -B/home/rguenth/x86_64/gcc4.0-230205/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/
-isystem /home/rguenth/x86_64/gcc4.0-230205/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/include
-isystem /home/rguenth/x86_64/gcc4.0-230205/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/sys-include
-L/tmp/gcc-obj/gcc/../ld -O2  -DIN_GCC    -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wold-style-definition  -isystem
./include  -fPIC -g -DHAVE_GTHR_DEFAULT -DIN_LIBGCC2 -D__GCC_FLOAT_NOT_NEEDED 
-I. -I. -I/net/alwazn/home/rguenth/src/gcc/gcc4.0/gcc
-I/net/alwazn/home/rguenth/src/gcc/gcc4.0/gcc/.
-I/net/alwazn/home/rguenth/src/gcc/gcc4.0/gcc/../include
-I/net/alwazn/home/rguenth/src/gcc/gcc4.0/gcc/../libcpp/include 
-fvisibility=hidden -DHIDE_EXPORTS -fexceptions -c
/net/alwazn/home/rguenth/src/gcc/gcc4.0/gcc/unwind-dw2-fde-glibc.c -o
libgcc/./unwind-dw2-fde-glibc.o
In file included from /net/alwazn/home/rguenth/src/gcc/gcc4.0/gcc/gthr-posix.h:43,
                 from ./gthr-default.h:1,
                 from /net/alwazn/home/rguenth/src/gcc/gcc4.0/gcc/gthr.h:114,
                 from /net/alwazn/home/rguenth/src/gcc/gcc4.0/gcc/unwind-dw2.c:42:
/usr/include/pthread.h:655: error: array type has incomplete element type
In file included from /net/alwazn/home/rguenth/src/gcc/gcc4.0/gcc/gthr-posix.h:43,
                 from ./gthr-default.h:1,
                 from /net/alwazn/home/rguenth/src/gcc/gcc4.0/gcc/gthr.h:114,
                 from
/net/alwazn/home/rguenth/src/gcc/gcc4.0/gcc/unwind-dw2-fde-glibc.c:50:
/usr/include/pthread.h:655: error: array type has incomplete element type
make[3]: *** [libgcc/./unwind-dw2-fde-glibc.o] Error 1
make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[3]: *** [libgcc/./unwind-dw2.o] Error 1

where the code in pthread.h:655 is really invalid:


/* Function used in the macros.  */
struct __jmp_buf_tag;
extern int __sigsetjmp (struct __jmp_buf_tag __env[1], int __savemask) __THROW;

because __jmp_buf_tag is incomplete (and is defined in setjmp.h).

-- 
           Summary: Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread
                    problem
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.0.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: bootstrap
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
  GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20166


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem
  2005-02-23 18:36 [Bug bootstrap/20166] New: Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-23 18:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-02-24 14:09 ` gschafer at zip dot com dot au
                   ` (14 subsequent siblings)
  15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-23 18:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-02-23 15:01 -------
It is not just debian but anyone who used a bad glibc in the first place.  I have no idea when this was 
introduced at all.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Component|bootstrap                   |target
           Keywords|                            |build


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20166


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem
  2005-02-23 18:36 [Bug bootstrap/20166] New: Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-02-23 18:39 ` [Bug target/20166] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-24 14:09 ` gschafer at zip dot com dot au
  2005-02-24 14:12 ` gschafer at zip dot com dot au
                   ` (13 subsequent siblings)
  15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: gschafer at zip dot com dot au @ 2005-02-24 14:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From gschafer at zip dot com dot au  2005-02-24 04:39 -------
This also happens for me on i686-pc-linux-gnu. It's a bog-standard unpatched
NPTL-enabled glibc-2.3.4 system. I don't think it classifies as a "bad glibc". I
concur that some fixincludes magic may be required here.

This is a showstopper.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |gschafer at zip dot com dot
                   |                            |au


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20166


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem
  2005-02-23 18:36 [Bug bootstrap/20166] New: Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-02-23 18:39 ` [Bug target/20166] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-02-24 14:09 ` gschafer at zip dot com dot au
@ 2005-02-24 14:12 ` gschafer at zip dot com dot au
  2005-02-24 14:19 ` themis_hv at yahoo dot co dot uk
                   ` (12 subsequent siblings)
  15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: gschafer at zip dot com dot au @ 2005-02-24 14:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From gschafer at zip dot com dot au  2005-02-24 06:43 -------
Here's the fix to pthread.h from Glibc cvs. I suppose the fixinclude "fix" would
need to replicate this:

http://sources.redhat.com/ml/glibc-cvs/2005-q1/msg00303.html

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20166


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem
  2005-02-23 18:36 [Bug bootstrap/20166] New: Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-02-24 14:12 ` gschafer at zip dot com dot au
@ 2005-02-24 14:19 ` themis_hv at yahoo dot co dot uk
  2005-02-24 14:21 ` themis_hv at yahoo dot co dot uk
                   ` (11 subsequent siblings)
  15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: themis_hv at yahoo dot co dot uk @ 2005-02-24 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From themis_hv at yahoo dot co dot uk  2005-02-24 08:18 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> It is not just debian but anyone who used a bad glibc in the first place.  I
have no idea when this was 
> introduced at all.
It was introduced by fix for GCC Bug ID 19333




-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20166


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem
  2005-02-23 18:36 [Bug bootstrap/20166] New: Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-02-24 14:19 ` themis_hv at yahoo dot co dot uk
@ 2005-02-24 14:21 ` themis_hv at yahoo dot co dot uk
  2005-02-28 23:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: themis_hv at yahoo dot co dot uk @ 2005-02-24 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |themis_hv at yahoo dot co
                   |                            |dot uk


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20166


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem
  2005-02-23 18:36 [Bug bootstrap/20166] New: Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-02-24 14:21 ` themis_hv at yahoo dot co dot uk
@ 2005-02-28 23:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-03-01 16:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-28 23:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-02-28 18:28 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > It is not just debian but anyone who used a bad glibc in the first place.  I
> have no idea when this was 
> > introduced at all.
> It was introduced by fix for GCC Bug ID 19333

I mean in glibc, as I have much older glibc and it works still.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2005-02-28 18:28:48
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20166


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem
  2005-02-23 18:36 [Bug bootstrap/20166] New: Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-02-28 23:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-03-01 16:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-03-01 17:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-03-01 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-03-01 16:01 -------
We really need to fix this for 4.0.0

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |critical
           Priority|P2                          |P1
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.0.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20166


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem
  2005-02-23 18:36 [Bug bootstrap/20166] New: Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-03-01 16:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-03-01 17:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-03-01 19:33 ` themis_hv at yahoo dot co dot uk
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-03-01 17:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-03-01 17:05 -------
Well considering this is glibc bug, yes this needs to be fixed but really glibc should have this code in 
the first place as it would break with -pedantic and they were using an undocumented extension.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|critical                    |normal
           Priority|P1                          |P2
   Target Milestone|4.0.0                       |---


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20166


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem
  2005-02-23 18:36 [Bug bootstrap/20166] New: Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-03-01 17:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-03-01 19:33 ` themis_hv at yahoo dot co dot uk
  2005-03-11  3:29 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: themis_hv at yahoo dot co dot uk @ 2005-03-01 19:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From themis_hv at yahoo dot co dot uk  2005-03-01 19:33 -------
Yes, glibc should have this code in the first place but we can not turn the
clock back/time travel.

Futhermore, I can reproduce it on i686-pc-linux-gnu with NPTL-enabled
glibc-2.3.3 system using official tarball with no patches.

IMHO, it's quite important for folks using NPTL-enabled systems to bootstrap GCC
4.0.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20166


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem
  2005-02-23 18:36 [Bug bootstrap/20166] New: Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-03-01 19:33 ` themis_hv at yahoo dot co dot uk
@ 2005-03-11  3:29 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-03-11 11:51 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-03-11  3:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-03-11 03:29 -------
I've restored the target milestone for this bug, but made the priority P3.  I
think that it would be good to fix this bug, since these GLIBCs are out there in
the wild.  The right fix is indded to add that to fixincludes.

Richard, Greg, would one of you like to give that a try?

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|P2                          |P3
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.0.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20166


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem
  2005-02-23 18:36 [Bug bootstrap/20166] New: Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-03-11  3:29 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-03-11 11:51 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-03-15  8:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-03-11 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-03-11 11:51 -------
Just FYI, most distributions ship LinuxThreads headers by default and you
need to specifically ask for NPTL headers ATM.  Linking happens against
LinuxThreads libraries as well by default, though NPTL is the default threading
library at runtime.  This is the setup e.g. Fedora Core, RHEL, SUSE, Mandrake,
Conectiva use.  So the problem is not that wide-spread.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20166


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem
  2005-02-23 18:36 [Bug bootstrap/20166] New: Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-03-11 11:51 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-03-15  8:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-03-20 17:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-03-15  8:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-03-15 08:15 -------
Patch here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-03/msg01377.html

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |dot org                     |org
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           Keywords|                            |patch
   Last reconfirmed|2005-02-28 18:28:48         |2005-03-15 08:15:47
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20166


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem
  2005-02-23 18:36 [Bug bootstrap/20166] New: Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (11 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-03-15  8:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-03-20 17:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-03-21 16:19 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-03-20 17:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-03-20 17:39 -------
(In reply to comment #12)
> Patch here:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-03/msg01377.html
Note for fixinclude patches, Bruce Korb likes to be CCed on them.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20166


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem
  2005-02-23 18:36 [Bug bootstrap/20166] New: Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (12 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-03-20 17:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-03-21 16:19 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-03-21 16:47 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-03-21 16:49 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-03-21 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-03-21 16:18 -------
Subject: Bug 20166

CVSROOT:	/cvs/gcc
Module name:	gcc
Branch: 	gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by:	rguenth@gcc.gnu.org	2005-03-21 16:17:55

Modified files:
	fixincludes    : ChangeLog inclhack.def fixincl.x 
	fixincludes/tests/base: pthread.h 

Log message:
	2005-03-21  Richard Guenther  <rguenth@gcc.gnu.org>
	
	PR target/20166
	* inclhack.def: Add fix for array of incomplete structures
	in function prototype in pthread.h.
	* fixincl.x: Regenerate.
	* tests/base/pthread.h: Adjust.

Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/fixincludes/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=1.32.2.1&r2=1.32.2.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/fixincludes/inclhack.def.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=1.16.14.1&r2=1.16.14.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/fixincludes/fixincl.x.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=1.16.14.1&r2=1.16.14.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/fixincludes/tests/base/pthread.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=1.3&r2=1.3.16.1



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20166


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem
  2005-02-23 18:36 [Bug bootstrap/20166] New: Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (13 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-03-21 16:19 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-03-21 16:47 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-03-21 16:49 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-03-21 16:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-03-21 16:46 -------
Subject: Bug 20166

CVSROOT:	/cvs/gcc
Module name:	gcc
Changes by:	rguenth@gcc.gnu.org	2005-03-21 16:46:09

Modified files:
	fixincludes    : ChangeLog inclhack.def fixincl.x 
	fixincludes/tests/base: pthread.h 

Log message:
	2005-03-21  Richard Guenther  <rguenth@gcc.gnu.org>
	
	PR target/20166
	* inclhack.def: Add fix for array of incomplete structures
	in function prototype in pthread.h.
	* fixincl.x: Regenerate.
	* tests/base/pthread.h: Adjust.

Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/fixincludes/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.33&r2=1.34
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/fixincludes/inclhack.def.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.17&r2=1.18
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/fixincludes/fixincl.x.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.17&r2=1.18
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/fixincludes/tests/base/pthread.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.3&r2=1.4



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20166


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem
  2005-02-23 18:36 [Bug bootstrap/20166] New: Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (14 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-03-21 16:47 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-03-21 16:49 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-03-21 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-03-21 16:48 -------
Fixed.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20166


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-03-21 16:49 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-02-23 18:36 [Bug bootstrap/20166] New: Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-23 18:39 ` [Bug target/20166] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-24 14:09 ` gschafer at zip dot com dot au
2005-02-24 14:12 ` gschafer at zip dot com dot au
2005-02-24 14:19 ` themis_hv at yahoo dot co dot uk
2005-02-24 14:21 ` themis_hv at yahoo dot co dot uk
2005-02-28 23:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-01 16:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-01 17:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-01 19:33 ` themis_hv at yahoo dot co dot uk
2005-03-11  3:29 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-11 11:51 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-15  8:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-20 17:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-21 16:19 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-21 16:47 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-21 16:49 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).