From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4277 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2005 11:35:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4190 invoked by uid 48); 2 Mar 2005 11:35:05 -0000 Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 11:35:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050302113505.4189.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "steven at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041006153323.17863.kunert@physik.tu-dresden.de> References: <20041006153323.17863.kunert@physik.tu-dresden.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/17863] [4.0/4.1 Regression] threefold performance loss, not inlining as much X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00192.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-02 11:35 ------- Performance bugs are never critical. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|critical |normal http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17863