* [Bug tree-optimization/20122] Wrong code with gcc 4.0 tree-vectorizer
2005-02-21 21:49 [Bug tree-optimization/20122] New: Wrong code with gcc 4.0 tree-vectorizer micis at gmx dot de
@ 2005-02-21 23:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-24 16:15 ` irar at il dot ibm dot com
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-21 23:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-21 18:49 -------
I think this is related to PR 19716. Note the tree level looks correct to me.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20122
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/20122] Wrong code with gcc 4.0 tree-vectorizer
2005-02-21 21:49 [Bug tree-optimization/20122] New: Wrong code with gcc 4.0 tree-vectorizer micis at gmx dot de
2005-02-21 23:11 ` [Bug tree-optimization/20122] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-24 16:15 ` irar at il dot ibm dot com
2005-03-02 10:28 ` micis at gmx dot de
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: irar at il dot ibm dot com @ 2005-02-24 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From irar at il dot ibm dot com 2005-02-24 13:41 -------
I found the problem that causes this. I'll send the patch next week.
Ira
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20122
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/20122] Wrong code with gcc 4.0 tree-vectorizer
2005-02-21 21:49 [Bug tree-optimization/20122] New: Wrong code with gcc 4.0 tree-vectorizer micis at gmx dot de
2005-02-21 23:11 ` [Bug tree-optimization/20122] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-24 16:15 ` irar at il dot ibm dot com
@ 2005-03-02 10:28 ` micis at gmx dot de
2005-03-02 11:43 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: micis at gmx dot de @ 2005-03-02 10:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From micis at gmx dot de 2005-03-02 10:27 -------
After you found the problem, may I ask you to set the status NEW and target
milestone to 4.0.0 ?
That way this bug would show up in the list of open bugs for gcc40.
Michael Cieslinski
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20122
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/20122] Wrong code with gcc 4.0 tree-vectorizer
2005-02-21 21:49 [Bug tree-optimization/20122] New: Wrong code with gcc 4.0 tree-vectorizer micis at gmx dot de
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-03-02 10:28 ` micis at gmx dot de
@ 2005-03-02 11:43 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2005-03-02 12:44 ` irar at il dot ibm dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: giovannibajo at libero dot it @ 2005-03-02 11:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-03-02 11:42 -------
Ira, can you please remember to confirm bugs in Bugzilla when you find them?
Micheal, this bug cannot be fixed in 4.0 since it is not a regression (the
vectorizer is new). I would argue in favor of a new rule that allows to fix
bugs in release branches for new features which are disabled by default, but
for now this bug won't have a 4.0 milestone.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |irar at il dot ibm dot com
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-03-02 11:42:36
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20122
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/20122] Wrong code with gcc 4.0 tree-vectorizer
2005-02-21 21:49 [Bug tree-optimization/20122] New: Wrong code with gcc 4.0 tree-vectorizer micis at gmx dot de
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-03-02 11:43 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
@ 2005-03-02 12:44 ` irar at il dot ibm dot com
2005-03-02 12:46 ` irar at il dot ibm dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: irar at il dot ibm dot com @ 2005-03-02 12:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |irar at il dot ibm dot com
|dot org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2005-03-02 11:42:36 |2005-03-02 12:43:57
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20122
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/20122] Wrong code with gcc 4.0 tree-vectorizer
2005-02-21 21:49 [Bug tree-optimization/20122] New: Wrong code with gcc 4.0 tree-vectorizer micis at gmx dot de
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2005-03-02 12:44 ` irar at il dot ibm dot com
@ 2005-03-02 12:46 ` irar at il dot ibm dot com
2005-03-03 10:44 ` micis at gmx dot de
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: irar at il dot ibm dot com @ 2005-03-02 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From irar at il dot ibm dot com 2005-03-02 12:45 -------
Fixed in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg01788.html. Waiting for
review.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20122
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/20122] Wrong code with gcc 4.0 tree-vectorizer
2005-02-21 21:49 [Bug tree-optimization/20122] New: Wrong code with gcc 4.0 tree-vectorizer micis at gmx dot de
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2005-03-02 12:46 ` irar at il dot ibm dot com
@ 2005-03-03 10:44 ` micis at gmx dot de
2005-05-02 11:58 ` micis at gmx dot de
2005-05-02 12:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: micis at gmx dot de @ 2005-03-03 10:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From micis at gmx dot de 2005-03-03 10:44 -------
I applied you patch and did a full bootstrap on x86_64.
No new regressions.
It fixes my problem.
Michael Cieslinski
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20122
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/20122] Wrong code with gcc 4.0 tree-vectorizer
2005-02-21 21:49 [Bug tree-optimization/20122] New: Wrong code with gcc 4.0 tree-vectorizer micis at gmx dot de
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2005-03-03 10:44 ` micis at gmx dot de
@ 2005-05-02 11:58 ` micis at gmx dot de
2005-05-02 12:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: micis at gmx dot de @ 2005-05-02 11:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From micis at gmx dot de 2005-05-02 11:58 -------
The patch given in comment #5 seems to be included in gcc400 and in mainline.
I think this PR should be closed.
Michael Cieslinski
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20122
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/20122] Wrong code with gcc 4.0 tree-vectorizer
2005-02-21 21:49 [Bug tree-optimization/20122] New: Wrong code with gcc 4.0 tree-vectorizer micis at gmx dot de
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2005-05-02 11:58 ` micis at gmx dot de
@ 2005-05-02 12:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-05-02 12:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20122
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread