From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-133132-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 5337 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2005 21:36:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5286 invoked by uid 48); 2 Mar 2005 21:36:36 -0000
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 21:36:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20050302213636.5285.qmail@sourceware.org>
From: "aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20050215012640.19968.reichelt@gcc.gnu.org>
References: <20050215012640.19968.reichelt@gcc.gnu.org>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/19968] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Warning omitted for non-derived classes
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00287.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-03-02 21:36 -------
I think this is correct behavior.  Without inheritance, the struct is POD, so
different rules apply.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19968