public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/19968] New: Warning omitted for non-derived classes @ 2005-02-15 13:29 reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-15 14:14 ` [Bug c++/19968] [3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (3 more replies) 0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-15 13:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs Compiling the following code snippet with -Wextra, a sensible warning is issued: ====================== struct B {}; struct A : B { const int i; }; ====================== warn.cc:5: warning: non-static const member 'const int A::i' in class without a constructor However, if A is not a derived class, the warning is not given: ====================== struct A { const int i; }; ====================== This is at least inconsistent. I'd vote for a warning in the second case, too. -- Summary: Warning omitted for non-derived classes Product: gcc Version: 4.0.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic, monitored Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19968 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/19968] [3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression] Warning omitted for non-derived classes 2005-02-15 13:29 [Bug c++/19968] New: Warning omitted for non-derived classes reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-15 14:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-15 14:14 ` [Bug c++/19968] " reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-15 14:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-15 01:32 ------- : Search converges between 2002-10-02-trunk (#92) and 2002-10-03-trunk (#93). Confirmed. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|enhancement |minor Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed| |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-02-15 01:32:08 date| | Summary|Warning omitted for non- |[3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression] |derived classes |Warning omitted for non- | |derived classes Target Milestone|--- |3.4.4 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19968 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/19968] Warning omitted for non-derived classes 2005-02-15 13:29 [Bug c++/19968] New: Warning omitted for non-derived classes reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-15 14:14 ` [Bug c++/19968] [3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-15 14:14 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-02 21:36 ` [Bug c++/19968] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] " aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-02 21:54 ` bangerth at dealii dot org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-15 14:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-15 01:29 ------- Btw, the warning in the second case is missing since gcc 3.3. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19968 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/19968] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Warning omitted for non-derived classes 2005-02-15 13:29 [Bug c++/19968] New: Warning omitted for non-derived classes reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-15 14:14 ` [Bug c++/19968] [3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-15 14:14 ` [Bug c++/19968] " reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-03-02 21:36 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-02 21:54 ` bangerth at dealii dot org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-03-02 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Additional Comments From aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-02 21:36 ------- I think this is correct behavior. Without inheritance, the struct is POD, so different rules apply. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19968 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/19968] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Warning omitted for non-derived classes 2005-02-15 13:29 [Bug c++/19968] New: Warning omitted for non-derived classes reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2005-03-02 21:36 ` [Bug c++/19968] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] " aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-03-02 21:54 ` bangerth at dealii dot org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2005-03-02 21:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-03-02 21:54 ------- Correct. The class without inheritance doesn't need a constructor since objects of this type can be initialized using a brace-enclosed list. The class with inheritance is not POD, so it can't be initialized that way and needs a constructor. This should demonstrate this: ----------------- struct B {}; struct A1 : B { const int i; }; struct A2 { const int i; }; A1 a1 = { 1 }; // not ok A2 a2 = { 1 }; // ok ----------------- g/x> /home/bangerth/bin/gcc-3.4.4-pre/bin/c++ -W -Wall -ansi -pedantic -c x.cc x.cc:3: warning: non-static const member `const int A1::i' in class without a constructor x.cc:6: error: `a1' must be initialized by constructor, not by `{...}' This is therefore not a bug but correct behavior. W. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19968 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-03-02 21:54 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2005-02-15 13:29 [Bug c++/19968] New: Warning omitted for non-derived classes reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-15 14:14 ` [Bug c++/19968] [3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-15 14:14 ` [Bug c++/19968] " reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-02 21:36 ` [Bug c++/19968] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] " aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-02 21:54 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).