From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26572 invoked by alias); 3 Mar 2005 23:00:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26549 invoked by uid 48); 3 Mar 2005 23:00:46 -0000 Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 23:00:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050303230046.26548.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "giovannibajo at libero dot it" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050303182015.20303.hjl@lucon.org> References: <20050303182015.20303.hjl@lucon.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/20303] Can't push more than 16 nested visibility X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00435.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-03-03 23:00 ------- (In reply to comment #4) I strongly agree with everything in JSM's post. There is simply no reason for keeping such a stupid limit, and even less for manually optimizing conditions to enhance the limit. Using a VEC is more than enough for this case. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed| |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-03-03 23:00:45 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20303