From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21664 invoked by alias); 4 Mar 2005 04:44:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 21627 invoked by alias); 4 Mar 2005 04:44:55 -0000 Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 04:44:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050304044455.21626.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "stevenj at fftw dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050223185848.20178.stevenj@fftw.org> References: <20050223185848.20178.stevenj@fftw.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/20178] COMPLEX function returns incompatible with g77 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00475.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From stevenj at fftw dot org 2005-03-04 04:44 ------- Subject: Re: COMPLEX function returns incompatible with g77 On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > I agree with you that -ff2c should imply -fsecond-underscore. I don't > agree that the advantages of -ff2c outweigh the disadvantages of > -fno-f2c so far that -fno-f2c should be the default. Just to be clear, what exactly do you feel are the concrete practical advantages to -ff2c? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20178