From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1198 invoked by alias); 5 Mar 2005 18:49:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1166 invoked by uid 48); 5 Mar 2005 18:49:14 -0000 Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 18:49:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050305184914.1165.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "steven at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041006153323.17863.kunert@physik.tu-dresden.de> References: <20041006153323.17863.kunert@physik.tu-dresden.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/17863] [4.0/4.1 Regression] threefold performance loss, not inlining as much X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00661.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-05 18:49 ------- Even with Richard Guenther's patches, the only thing that really helps is setting --param large-function-growth=200, or more. The default is 100. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17863