From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8744 invoked by alias); 5 Mar 2005 21:47:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 8693 invoked by alias); 5 Mar 2005 21:47:36 -0000 Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 21:47:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050305214736.8691.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "mark at codesourcery dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050220111234.20103.falk@debian.org> References: <20050220111234.20103.falk@debian.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/20103] [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE in create_tmp_var with C99 style struct initializer X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00722.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-03-05 21:47 ------- Subject: Re: [PR c++/20103] failure to gimplify constructors for addressable types Alexandre Oliva wrote: > Testing now. I was a bit surprised that the casts to (const B&) > weren't reported as faulty, but didn't check the standard on it. I'd have to check the rules -- but I'm sure it's not a problem with your patch. Either its correct, or an already-present bug. > Ok > to install if testing passes? Yes. Thanks! -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20103