From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6147 invoked by alias); 10 Mar 2005 01:08:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6005 invoked by uid 48); 10 Mar 2005 01:08:24 -0000 Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 01:08:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050310010824.6004.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050306234801.20353.jbrandmeyer@earthlink.net> References: <20050306234801.20353.jbrandmeyer@earthlink.net> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/20353] uclibc does not provide C99 math functions X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg01227.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-10 01:08 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > uClibc has added these functions to SVN, and they will be available in the next > release of uClibc. However, their presence is still a configurable option - the > user can configure uClibc to not include any of the C99 math functions. What is > the best way to configure GCC in this case? Is there a relevant configure-time > option? Simply specifying -std=c++98 or -std=c89 is not enough to prevent this > behavior. None of the above, this is not a runtime configurable thing, as the libc have will it or not at configure time. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20353