From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21049 invoked by alias); 14 Mar 2005 03:58:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20715 invoked by uid 48); 14 Mar 2005 03:58:37 -0000 Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 03:58:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050314035837.20714.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050116013147.19466.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20050116013147.19466.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/19466] [meta-bug] bit-fields are non optimal X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg01682.txt.bz2 List-Id: -- Bug 19466 depends on bug 19331, which changed state. Bug 19331 Summary: [4.0 Regression] Inefficient code generated for bitfield assignment http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19331 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19466