From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6040 invoked by alias); 14 Mar 2005 06:34:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5954 invoked by uid 48); 14 Mar 2005 06:34:11 -0000 Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 06:34:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050314063411.5953.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050313183857.20460.tobi@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20050313183857.20460.tobi@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/20460] Nasty extensions that should always warn X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg01691.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-14 06:34 ------- While I can agree that REAL DO loop indices should cause a warning, it is incorrect to call this feature an extension to the language. Fortran 77 permitted such indices. Fortran 90 declared them to be obsolescent, which means the feature was permitted. Fortran 95 finally deleted them. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20460