From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12484 invoked by alias); 14 Mar 2005 14:25:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12380 invoked by alias); 14 Mar 2005 14:25:15 -0000 Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 14:25:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050314142515.12377.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "schlie at comcast dot net" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041208130405.18887.schlie@comcast.net> References: <20041208130405.18887.schlie@comcast.net> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/18887] [4.0/4.1 Regression] libgcc2.h Improperly determines required built-in function size requirements. X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg01697.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-03-14 14:25 ------- Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] libgcc2.h Improperly determines required built-in function size requirements. > ------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-03-13 > Closing as fixed, then. Paul, you can open a new enhancement PR to keep track > of the libgcc problem. Yup, that's fine; still trying to recover from some of the recent changes which seem to have mucked up the pieces what I had working; so unfortunately have taken a few steps back. thanks -paul- -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18887