[Bug c++/20497] New: Building Code on AMD 64bits c

[Bug c++/20497] New: Building Code on AMD 64bits c

[ajve at chevrontexaco dot com]

I am using gcc 3.3.2 and trying to build my code on AMD 64bits cluster.I am 
getting following error.
 
ix/oldiwel/inflow/winflowmodel_impl.hpp:669: error: unrecognizable insn:
(insn:HI 7100 7099 97 0 0x2aa66c2a20 (set (reg:SI 67)
        (plus:SI (mult:SI (reg:SI 67)
                (const_int 2 [0x2]))
            (const_int -1 [0xffffffffffffffff]))) -1 (insn_list 7099 (nil))
    (nil))
ix/oldiwel/inflow/winflowmodel_impl.hpp:669: internal compiler error: in
   extract_insn, at recog.c:2175
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
 
 
Anyone  help would be highly appreciated.
 
Thanks
Ajay

-- 
           Summary: Building Code on AMD 64bits c
           Product: gcc
           Version: 3.3.2
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: critical
          Priority: P2
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: ajve at chevrontexaco dot com
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20497

[Bug target/20497] Building Code on AMD 64bits c

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-03-16 17:11 -------
See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.

We need the preprocessed source.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org
           Severity|critical                    |minor
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING
          Component|c++                         |target
           Keywords|                            |ice-on-valid-code


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20497

[Bug target/20497] Building Code on AMD 64bits c

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-03-16 17:15 -------
*** Bug 20498 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20497

[Bug target/20497] Building Code on AMD 64bits c

[steven at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-03-17 00:04 -------
I can successfully compile your test case with the gcc that is shipped 
with SUSE 9.2 ("gcc (GCC) 3.3.4 (pre 3.3.5 20040809)"). 
 
You say you are using GCC 3.3.2, but if you have any influence on it I 
suggest you try to upgrade to the more recent GCC 3.4, or to a GCC 3.3 
based on the hammer-branch of GCC's CVS repository.  The FSF "base" 
GCC 3.3 does not support AMD64 ("hammer") very well.  The hammer-branch 
is where most of the tuning and optimizing for AMD64 was done, and the 
hammer-branch is also the code base that we at SUSE build our system 
compiler from. 
 
 

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20497

[Bug target/20497] Building Code on AMD 64bits c

[steven at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-03-17 00:06 -------
I should notice I tried -O2 and -O3.  If you used other flags, you 
should report those too.  Your bug report is not very detailed. 
 

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20497

[Bug target/20497] Building Code on AMD 64bits c

[ajve at chevrontexaco dot com]

------- Additional Comments From ajve at chevrontexaco dot com  2005-03-17 00:09 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> I should notice I tried -O2 and -O3.  If you used other flags, you 
> should report those too.  Your bug report is not very detailed. 
>  

I am using -O3 -DNDEBUG -Wall flag.
Please let me know if you need any more info for debugging

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20497

[Bug target/20497] Building Code on AMD 64bits c

[ajve at chevrontexaco dot com]

------- Additional Comments From ajve at chevrontexaco dot com  2005-03-17 00:11 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> I can successfully compile your test case with the gcc that is shipped 
> with SUSE 9.2 ("gcc (GCC) 3.3.4 (pre 3.3.5 20040809)"). 
>  
> You say you are using GCC 3.3.2, but if you have any influence on it I 
> suggest you try to upgrade to the more recent GCC 3.4, or to a GCC 3.3 
> based on the hammer-branch of GCC's CVS repository.  The FSF "base" 
> GCC 3.3 does not support AMD64 ("hammer") very well.  The hammer-branch 
> is where most of the tuning and optimizing for AMD64 was done, and the 
> hammer-branch is also the code base that we at SUSE build our system 
> compiler from. 
>  
>  

>From where I can download this hammer-branch for my testing

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20497

[Bug target/20497] Building Code on AMD 64bits c

[ajve at chevrontexaco dot com]

------- Additional Comments From ajve at chevrontexaco dot com  2005-03-17 21:34 -------


I tried with GCC 3.3.4 but still its giving me the same error.I downloaded the 
GCC 3.3.4 from GNU site...



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20497

[Bug target/20497] Building Code on AMD 64bits c

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-03-23 05:37 -------
Try with 3.4.3 as that is the current release of gcc.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20497

[Bug target/20497] Building Code on AMD 64bits c

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-06-22 00:19 -------
No feedback in 3 months.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20497

[Bug target/20497] Building Code on AMD 64bits c

[steven at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-06-25 11:41 -------
You can find how to download the hammer branch on http://gcc.gnu.org/cvs.html. 
 
 

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20497