From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30606 invoked by alias); 23 Mar 2005 03:15:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30526 invoked by uid 48); 23 Mar 2005 03:15:14 -0000 Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 03:15:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050323031514.30525.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050202233416.19769.dberlin@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20050202233416.19769.dberlin@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/19769] [4.0 Regression] GCC produces wrong dwarf2 output that breaks gdb X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg02685.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-23 03:15 ------- May as well take it, seeing as how I wrote a patch for it. The gdb failures do not seem related to my change, and when I reran the gdb testsuite, they disappeared. I don't know what happened, but as far as I am concerned the patch has passed the test and I'm checking it in. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |wilson at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2005-02-02 23:50:07 |2005-03-23 03:15:13 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19769