From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26868 invoked by alias); 24 Mar 2005 17:06:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25775 invoked by uid 48); 24 Mar 2005 17:05:43 -0000 Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 17:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050324170543.25774.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050324112142.20617.amylaar@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20050324112142.20617.amylaar@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/20617] [4.0/4.1 regression] shared SH libgcc is exporting too many symbols X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg02886.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-24 17:05 ------- Dan points out that Joern was probably referring to Andrew's downgrade, rather than Zack's comment, when speaking about seriousness. I'm not sure what prompted Andrew to make that change, but I certainly think it's reasonable for target maintainers to set the severity for bugs that affect their ports. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20617