public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/20470] New: Branching sequence generated for ABS(x-y)
@ 2005-03-14 17:09 pthaugen at us dot ibm dot com
  2005-03-14 17:12 ` [Bug tree-optimization/20470] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (8 more replies)
  0 siblings, 9 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pthaugen at us dot ibm dot com @ 2005-03-14 17:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

Noticed that gcc/g++ generate a branching sequence instead of straight-line code
for expressions of the form ABS(x-y). Changing the operator to something else
(+, *, /) resutls in straight-line code.


#define ABS(value)   ( (value)>=0 ? (value) : -(value) )
int i,j,k,l,m,n;

void f1()
{
  l = ABS(m+n);
  i = ABS(j-k);
}

-- 
           Summary: Branching sequence generated for ABS(x-y)
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.1.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: tree-optimization
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: pthaugen at us dot ibm dot com
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: powerpc*-*-*
  GCC host triplet: powerpc*-*-*
GCC target triplet: powerpc*-*-*


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20470


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/20470] Branching sequence generated for ABS(x-y)
  2005-03-14 17:09 [Bug tree-optimization/20470] New: Branching sequence generated for ABS(x-y) pthaugen at us dot ibm dot com
@ 2005-03-14 17:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-03-14 17:13 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-03-14 17:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-03-14 17:12 -------
Confirmed, I know where this comes from too, SPEC (but I had forgot which test).

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org
           Severity|normal                      |enhancement
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
           Keywords|                            |missed-optimization
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2005-03-14 17:12:47
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20470


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/20470] Branching sequence generated for ABS(x-y)
  2005-03-14 17:09 [Bug tree-optimization/20470] New: Branching sequence generated for ABS(x-y) pthaugen at us dot ibm dot com
  2005-03-14 17:12 ` [Bug tree-optimization/20470] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-03-14 17:13 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-03-14 19:13 ` pthaugen at us dot ibm dot com
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-03-14 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-03-14 17:13 -------
I will note I know there is an Apple radar about this bug.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20470


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/20470] Branching sequence generated for ABS(x-y)
  2005-03-14 17:09 [Bug tree-optimization/20470] New: Branching sequence generated for ABS(x-y) pthaugen at us dot ibm dot com
  2005-03-14 17:12 ` [Bug tree-optimization/20470] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-03-14 17:13 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-03-14 19:13 ` pthaugen at us dot ibm dot com
  2005-03-14 22:29 ` pthaugen at us dot ibm dot com
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pthaugen at us dot ibm dot com @ 2005-03-14 19:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pthaugen at us dot ibm dot com  2005-03-14 19:13 -------
I noticed this in the twolf benchmark of SPEC, dimbox.c:new_dbox_a().



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20470


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/20470] Branching sequence generated for ABS(x-y)
  2005-03-14 17:09 [Bug tree-optimization/20470] New: Branching sequence generated for ABS(x-y) pthaugen at us dot ibm dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-03-14 19:13 ` pthaugen at us dot ibm dot com
@ 2005-03-14 22:29 ` pthaugen at us dot ibm dot com
  2005-03-15 18:22 ` pthaugen at us dot ibm dot com
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pthaugen at us dot ibm dot com @ 2005-03-14 22:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pthaugen at us dot ibm dot com  2005-03-14 22:29 -------
Decided to look into this myself, currently testing a patch.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20470


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/20470] Branching sequence generated for ABS(x-y)
  2005-03-14 17:09 [Bug tree-optimization/20470] New: Branching sequence generated for ABS(x-y) pthaugen at us dot ibm dot com
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-03-14 22:29 ` pthaugen at us dot ibm dot com
@ 2005-03-15 18:22 ` pthaugen at us dot ibm dot com
  2005-03-25 20:08 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pthaugen at us dot ibm dot com @ 2005-03-15 18:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pthaugen at us dot ibm dot com  2005-03-15 18:22 -------
Ditto here, except added additional call to negate_expr_p(arg2) to make sure it
was ok to flip the expression back to it's original form. Not sure if that was
necessary, was assuming I'd get comments when I posted a patch (hopefully soon,
had some problems with testing).


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20470


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/20470] Branching sequence generated for ABS(x-y)
  2005-03-14 17:09 [Bug tree-optimization/20470] New: Branching sequence generated for ABS(x-y) pthaugen at us dot ibm dot com
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-03-15 18:22 ` pthaugen at us dot ibm dot com
@ 2005-03-25 20:08 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-03-25 20:10 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-03-25 20:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-03-25 20:08 -------
Subject: Bug 20470

CVSROOT:	/cvs/gcc
Module name:	gcc
Changes by:	dje@gcc.gnu.org	2005-03-25 20:08:33

Modified files:
	gcc            : ChangeLog fold-const.c 

Log message:
	2005-03-25  Pat Haugen  <pthaugen@us.ibm.com>
	
	PR tree-optimization/20470
	* fold-const.c (fold_cond_expr_with_comparison): Recognize/fold
	ABS(x-y).

Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=2.7998&r2=2.7999
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/fold-const.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.550&r2=1.551



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20470


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/20470] Branching sequence generated for ABS(x-y)
  2005-03-14 17:09 [Bug tree-optimization/20470] New: Branching sequence generated for ABS(x-y) pthaugen at us dot ibm dot com
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-03-25 20:08 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-03-25 20:10 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-03-28 21:31 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-03-28 21:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-03-25 20:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-03-25 20:10 -------
Subject: Bug 20470

CVSROOT:	/cvs/gcc
Module name:	gcc
Changes by:	dje@gcc.gnu.org	2005-03-25 20:10:39

Modified files:
	gcc/testsuite  : ChangeLog 
Added files:
	gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa: pr20470.c 

Log message:
	2005-03-25  Pat Haugen  <pthaugen@us.ibm.com>
	
	PR tree-optimization/20470
	* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr20470.c: New test.

Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.5220&r2=1.5221
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr20470.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20470


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/20470] Branching sequence generated for ABS(x-y)
  2005-03-14 17:09 [Bug tree-optimization/20470] New: Branching sequence generated for ABS(x-y) pthaugen at us dot ibm dot com
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-03-25 20:10 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-03-28 21:31 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-03-28 21:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: dje at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-03-28 21:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From dje at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-03-28 21:31 -------
patch committed

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20470


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/20470] Branching sequence generated for ABS(x-y)
  2005-03-14 17:09 [Bug tree-optimization/20470] New: Branching sequence generated for ABS(x-y) pthaugen at us dot ibm dot com
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-03-28 21:31 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-03-28 21:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-03-28 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.1.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20470


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-03-28 21:32 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-03-14 17:09 [Bug tree-optimization/20470] New: Branching sequence generated for ABS(x-y) pthaugen at us dot ibm dot com
2005-03-14 17:12 ` [Bug tree-optimization/20470] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-14 17:13 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-14 19:13 ` pthaugen at us dot ibm dot com
2005-03-14 22:29 ` pthaugen at us dot ibm dot com
2005-03-15 18:22 ` pthaugen at us dot ibm dot com
2005-03-25 20:08 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-25 20:10 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-28 21:31 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-28 21:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).