public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/20762] New: [tcb] missed copy-prop opportunity
@ 2005-04-04 22:45 kazu at cs dot umass dot edu
  2005-04-05 23:26 ` [Bug tree-optimization/20762] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-04-12 23:13 ` kazu at cs dot umass dot edu
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: kazu at cs dot umass dot edu @ 2005-04-04 22:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

Consider:

int
foo (int a, int b)
{
  int c = a;
  int d;
  if (a == c)
    d = a;
  else
    d = b;
  return d;
}

Note that "a == c" always holds, so the whole function should collapse
down to return a;.  However, copy-prop on TCB outputs

foo (a, b)
{
  int d;
  int c;
  int D.1137;

<bb 0>:
  c_3 = a_2;
  d_8 = a_2;

  # d_1 = PHI <a_2(0)>;
<L2>:;
  d_4 = d_1;
  return d_1;

}

Note that we are still returning d_1.  Not good.

The problem is that we are not folding COND_EXPR_COND during propagation.

-- 
           Summary: [tcb] missed copy-prop opportunity
           Product: gcc
           Version: unknown
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: missed-optimization
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P2
         Component: tree-optimization
        AssignedTo: kazu at cs dot umass dot edu
        ReportedBy: kazu at cs dot umass dot edu
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20762


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/20762] [tcb] missed copy-prop opportunity
  2005-04-04 22:45 [Bug tree-optimization/20762] New: [tcb] missed copy-prop opportunity kazu at cs dot umass dot edu
@ 2005-04-05 23:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-04-12 23:13 ` kazu at cs dot umass dot edu
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-04-05 23:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-04-05 23:26 -------
Confirmed.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2005-04-05 23:26:25
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20762


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/20762] [tcb] missed copy-prop opportunity
  2005-04-04 22:45 [Bug tree-optimization/20762] New: [tcb] missed copy-prop opportunity kazu at cs dot umass dot edu
  2005-04-05 23:26 ` [Bug tree-optimization/20762] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-04-12 23:13 ` kazu at cs dot umass dot edu
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: kazu at cs dot umass dot edu @ 2005-04-12 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From kazu at cs dot umass dot edu  2005-04-12 23:13 -------
PR20913 has a better testcase.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 20913 ***

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20762


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-04-12 23:13 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-04-04 22:45 [Bug tree-optimization/20762] New: [tcb] missed copy-prop opportunity kazu at cs dot umass dot edu
2005-04-05 23:26 ` [Bug tree-optimization/20762] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-12 23:13 ` kazu at cs dot umass dot edu

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).