From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15299 invoked by alias); 5 Apr 2005 14:36:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14993 invoked by uid 48); 5 Apr 2005 14:36:34 -0000 Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 14:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050405143634.14992.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pcarlini at suse dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050404213802.20758.kreckel@ginac.de> References: <20050404213802.20758.kreckel@ginac.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/20758] operator-(const T&, const complex&) vs operator-(const complex&, const complex&) X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00461.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-04-05 14:36 ------- Ok, you are right (forgot that your testcases is for negative real part): then the imaginary part of the log changes from +Pi to -Pi, since it's equal to arg. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20758