From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10858 invoked by alias); 6 Apr 2005 06:38:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10820 invoked by uid 48); 6 Apr 2005 06:38:43 -0000 Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 06:38:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050406063843.10819.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050206175258.19794.kazu@cs.umass.edu> References: <20050206175258.19794.kazu@cs.umass.edu> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/19794] [meta-bug] Jump threading related bugs X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00603.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-06 06:38 ------- (In reply to comment #7) > They don't even bear-out on other x86 platforms -- my older P3 and AMD > boxes don't show the same kind of big improvement (they show a small > improvements). However, both of my P4s show big improvements. Huh, both of those targets are still x86. So what about on say Power4 or PowerPC 970? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19794