public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "kreckel at ginac dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/20758] operator-(const T&, const complex<T>&) vs operator-(const complex<T>&, const complex<T>&)
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 22:06:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050407220610.24441.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050404213802.20758.kreckel@ginac.de>
------- Additional Comments From kreckel at ginac dot de 2005-04-07 22:06 -------
(In reply to comment #15)
> Well, Richard, numerical analysis is not a game, ...
Right, but a logical argument is not a game.
> x - (z + i * w) -> (x - z) + i * (-w)
>
> We cannot disregard that, I think: before implementing something else we
> should at least try to understand why "LIA-3" mandates that.
Indeed. Has that standard been released yet? What's the exact reference, and
is there some public access, maybe to drafts?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20758
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-07 22:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-04 21:38 [Bug libstdc++/20758] New: " kreckel at ginac dot de
2005-04-04 21:39 ` [Bug libstdc++/20758] " kreckel at ginac dot de
2005-04-04 21:40 ` kreckel at ginac dot de
2005-04-04 21:42 ` kreckel at ginac dot de
2005-04-04 21:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-04 21:52 ` kreckel at ginac dot de
2005-04-04 23:18 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-04 23:37 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2005-04-05 14:01 ` kreckel at ginac dot de
2005-04-05 14:36 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2005-04-05 14:48 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2005-04-05 15:29 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2005-04-06 8:59 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-04-06 9:17 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2005-04-06 9:27 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2005-04-07 20:51 ` kreckel at ginac dot de
2005-04-07 21:17 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2005-04-07 22:06 ` kreckel at ginac dot de [this message]
2005-04-07 22:19 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2005-04-08 8:23 ` kreckel at ginac dot de
2005-04-08 9:55 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2005-04-08 14:16 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-04-08 14:20 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-04-08 22:16 ` kreckel at ginac dot de
2005-04-24 22:49 ` kreckel at ginac dot de
[not found] <bug-20758-1882@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2006-01-30 4:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-06 16:37 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050407220610.24441.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).