public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "gdr at integrable-solutions dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/20758] operator-(const T&, const complex<T>&) vs operator-(const complex<T>&, const complex<T>&) Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 14:20:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20050408142005.12099.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20050404213802.20758.kreckel@ginac.de> ------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-04-08 14:20 ------- Subject: Re: operator-(const T&, const complex<T>&) vs operator-(const complex<T>&, const complex<T>&) "kreckel at ginac dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes: | (In reply to comment #15) | > Well, Richard, numerical analysis is not a game, ... | | Right, but a logical argument is not a game. IT may be a "word ame" though :-) | > x - (z + i * w) -> (x - z) + i * (-w) | > | > We cannot disregard that, I think: before implementing something else we | > should at least try to understand why "LIA-3" mandates that. | | Indeed. Has that standard been released yet? It is not released yet. | What's the exact reference, and | is there some public access, maybe to drafts? I think you can have it on WG11 web-site, go to www.open-std.org. -- Gaby -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20758
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-08 14:20 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2005-04-04 21:38 [Bug libstdc++/20758] New: " kreckel at ginac dot de 2005-04-04 21:39 ` [Bug libstdc++/20758] " kreckel at ginac dot de 2005-04-04 21:40 ` kreckel at ginac dot de 2005-04-04 21:42 ` kreckel at ginac dot de 2005-04-04 21:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-04 21:52 ` kreckel at ginac dot de 2005-04-04 23:18 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-04 23:37 ` pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-04-05 14:01 ` kreckel at ginac dot de 2005-04-05 14:36 ` pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-04-05 14:48 ` pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-04-05 15:29 ` pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-04-06 8:59 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-04-06 9:17 ` pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-04-06 9:27 ` pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-04-07 20:51 ` kreckel at ginac dot de 2005-04-07 21:17 ` pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-04-07 22:06 ` kreckel at ginac dot de 2005-04-07 22:19 ` pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-04-08 8:23 ` kreckel at ginac dot de 2005-04-08 9:55 ` pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-04-08 14:16 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-04-08 14:20 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net [this message] 2005-04-08 22:16 ` kreckel at ginac dot de 2005-04-24 22:49 ` kreckel at ginac dot de [not found] <bug-20758-1882@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2006-01-30 4:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-06 16:37 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20050408142005.12099.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).